I am blue tonight, and have been all day, because Susan Hill and I never got the chance to sit down and discuss our issues.  I wrote her in the Summer of 2008 and linked to her blogs often from this site.  I tried, but probably not hard enough.  I wish I had tried harder.

Here is what her friends are saying about her.

It feels like a door has closed that will never be open again. Here is Susan’s final television interview.

Am I mourning a devil in a black dress?  (I will always remember Susan in the black dress at our Summer, 1989 rescue, standing at the door of 827 Webster Street.  She was clearly not afraid of the pro-lifers, for good reason — we were quite peaceful.)  She was a beautiful and graceful women in her day  — one that managed her own, personal holocaust.  According to some estimates that I have read she oversaw the legal extermination of 400,000 fetuses.  (Fetus is Latin for “little person.”)

Each one of these 400,000 “pests” where guilty of being in the wrong place (an unwelcome womb) at the wrong time (within the first six months of gestation).  Hill did not exterminate the preborn once they reached six months of development — she then sent the mothers to Kansas for the coup de grace on their babies.

How did this product of a Southern Baptist upbringing live with such death-dealing?  Her ideology trumped the understanding of Holy Scripture that she had been taught in her youth.  Like many feminists (she was given the NOW’s unsung hero award in 1990) she was a “Jet all the way.” 

Here come the Jets
Like a bat out of hell.
Someone gets in our way,
Someone don’t feel so well!

400,000 little ones could sing about being in Susan’s way. 

But was Susan just doing God’s Will?   Her partner in abortion in Fort Wayne, George Ulrich Klopfer (meet him here) claims he does just that.  Could they be right?

If you are adverse to controversy stop reading this post right now.  If you are post-abortive you should probably consider turning away as well.

Many poke fun of the Roman Catholic faith for its teaching that babies who die without baptism go to “Limbo.”  We all want to believe that such innocents are whisked on angel’s wings straight to Heaven.  It makes comforting the post-abortive women  so much more, well, hopeful.  “Your babies wait for you in Heaven.”  We can comfort ourselves with the belief that those preborns “processed” in the local abortuaries end up in a better place once the vacuum aspirator dispatches them from this terrestrial orb.

But let’s be consistent.  Doesn’t that make Susan Hill and Ulrich Klopfer evangelists of the order of Billy Graham?   I mean, if those kids were born they could have experienced hunger, thirst, child abuse, a teenage wasteland, the quiet desperation of growing older and then — so goes the teaching — a high likelihood of going to Hell.  (Broad is that path, we have it on good authority.)

None of the little ones who got in Susan Hill’s way had to take this risk.  They did not have to worry about a hellish life or life in Hell — she, through her tools like Klopfer, sent them straight to the pearly gates.

If you really believed this then what is the big deal about having an abortion — or two — or ten.   Speaking of ten, what couple could give birth to ten kids and have a good faith belief that all make it to Heaven?  Most large families have at least one “black sheep” or “stray cat.”  But under the theology discussed herein all ten go straight to Heaven immediately following their abortion.

Making Susan Hill a super evangelist.  Forget the Bible, she carried a scalpel.

But there is another possibility.  One far less comforting.  One allowing us to view Susan as an agent of the Evil One — an architect of genocide both physical and spiritual.

That is the belief that the aborted pre-born — carrying Adam’s curse but no baptism (other than their own blood) ended up in Limbo. 

What will their eternal fate be?  Who can say?  Not me, not you under this paradigm. 

We can only hope, as we are instructed to do in the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church:

 “As regards children who have died without baptism, the church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: ‘Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,’ allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without baptism.”

Who can have a second abortion after staring into that abyss of unknowing?  Only the most hardened.  This site makes that point, in a somewhat scoffing fashion.

Do we still mourn Susan Hill if Limbo is real?  Yes, but with a deep and abiding hatred for the empire that she built, managed and lost. 

Rest in peace, Susan, if you can. 

When you’re a Jet,
You’re a Jet all the way
From your first cigarette
To your last dyin’ day.

Susan, since there is no evidence that you repented from your great sin the best that I can do is hope that you landed in Limbo with all of the little ones that you sent to that same place.  May God have mercy on their souls first, and then even on your own.

Here is Jill Stanek’s article on Hill’s passing:      http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2010/02/abortionist_sus.html

Much is said of her here on the Institute’s website.  We hope she read some of it and made her peace with the Lord.  (She wrote about me before I wrote about her: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/4/69682/-The-Right-Wings-20-Year-Plan )

This much is now certain.  Her fate, for eternal life or eternal death, is now sealed.

Who’s next?

And so now, with no further adieu …. after introductions were made here is what I was asked to address …

Shades of Judge Robert Bork’s hearing before the Senate, no?

Yes, I have been “borked.”  And, to quote Justice Clarence Thomas, subjected to a high tech lynching.

Why?  Because I affirmed the Natural Law — before the government’s psychologist (when asked to deny it on a psych exam and in session), before the government’s psychiatrist (again, blatantly offered the opportunity to deny my Faith) and finally on June 1 in the above inquisition.  (Click here for an affidavit on how mental health was used “Soviet style” by agent Tim Sudrovech and his appointed “contractors” against this religiously-motivated political dissident)

What is the Natural Law?  See the category on the right or merely read what follows from a great American conservative:

A great deal of loose talk about natural law has occurred in very recent years. It was objected to Judge Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court that Bork did not believe in natural law; and when Judge Thomas was interrogated for that bench, the objection was raised that he did believe in natural law. These protestations came mostly from the same group of senators. Clearly a good many public men and women nowadays have only vague notions of what is signified by this term natural law. 

Objectively speaking, natural law, as a term of politics and jurisprudence, may be defined as a loosely knit body of rules of action prescribed by an authority superior to the state.

More to come tomorrow …

I am currently suing the Indiana Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program (JLAP), Terri Harrell, Tim Sudrovech, Elizabeth Bowman and Stephen Ross in federal district court for allegedly violating my constitutional rights by conspiring against my admission to the Indiana bar.  That case was filed on December 8, 2009.  Here’s some background on it; other posts at the category Brown v. Bowman further explain it.

I have also filed a petition for review with the United States Supreme Court appealing the State of Indiana’s denial of my right (yes, it is a right) to practice law in Indiana.  Indiana Supreme Court Chief Judge Randall Shepard upheld a thirty page order that followed my June 1, 2009 hearing.  That order was written by someone who deemed it best not to sign their name, probably because the order contained no legal analysis and flew in the face of Supreme Court precedent on how bar applicants are to be processed.  Charlotte Westerhauswas appoited Grand Inquisitor on my case.  Indiana Supreme Court-affiliated attorney Charles Kidd and others aided her in this work of legal fiction.  Posts gathered at Brown v. Board explain this state court appeal.  The entire argument will be posted at this site in the weeks to come.  It is now pending before the SCOTUS.  Here is the question presented.

The Indiana decision can be explained only as a the result of discrimination against a human rights activist by the Defendants in the Brown v. Bowman case.  That discrimination was the alleged conspiracy.

Here is some background on why I was the target of such a conspiracy:

In 1979, at the age of 20, I gave my life to Jesus Christ and attended Whatever Happened to the Human Race in Indianapolis where Dr. Francis Schaefferand C. Everett Koop. M.D. challenged me to be an activist for justice and human life.  I took up that challenge and have stayed the course ever since.

Ten years later, after it was clear that the pro-life movement was stagnating and political solutions alone were not going to end the scourge of abortion on demand I became involved in the budding Rescue Movement.

In 1990 Susan Hill, one of the foremost and most litigious agents of the culture of death in America, sued me out of economic existence from her flagship abortion clinic located in my home town at 827 Webster Street, Fort Wayne, Indiana.  She was joined in that suit by abortionist George Klopfer.

I left the Fort for Wichita, where I took a managerial role (unpaid) in the siege of late, late term abortionist George Tiller for two years.  Our activism helped the University of Kansas and HCA Wesley Hospital see the benefit of shutting down a longstanding abortionist training program ran out of Wichita.  This contributed to the nationwide drop in the supply of young abortionists. 

I was arrested more than a few times for loitering or trespass while attempting to intercede on behalf of pre-born children in the years before I became an attorney.  My most controversial arrest involved someone at the other end of the spectrum, however.  I peacefully but vocally interrupted the Wichita Police Department as they roughly arrested an 83 year old Irish Catholic great grandmother who was peacefully standing on a dentist’s parking lot adjacent to an abortion clinic with an “abortion kills children” sign.

She was later exonerated.   My arrest for attempting to tell the police that they were making a big mistake caused me to stand before federal judge Patrick Kelly. (Renowned for his biased Nightline appearance.)  He was determined to “break me” for my beliefs regarding the Higher Laws doctrine and after a one hour in chambers discussion of the historic Christian teaching that God’s law is over man’s law this federal judge ordered me imprisoned until I would pledge unreserved obedience to his fatally overbroad and unconstitutional injunction protecting Wichita’s merchant of death. 

I stood on conscience and after 68 days the federal government backed down and set me free without an oath of absolute obedience.  That was 1992.  Seventeen years later it is this stand on conscience and Christian teaching that ostensibly resulted in my denial of licensure in Indiana.   (The civil contempt was later vacated by same court that issued the order  — but that does not matter to the Indiana authorties, who claim to be advancing the highest interests of respect for the law in denying me a license in a law-free final order!)

After two years on the Wichita front I left for Regent University School of Law.  Three years later I was representing pro-life and pro-family activists for the American Family Association’s Center for Law & Policy.  I took on the culture of death and political correctness for Brother Don Wildmon for six years in that position, winning more than a few federal appellate cases.  The most important of these cases was probably Dr. David Saxe  v. State College School District  – often listed as one of Justice Sam Alito’s most important decisions while he was yet on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.  It struck down the leading Hate Speech code in the nation (at that time) and dealt the forces of political correctness a harsh blow.

All in the p.c. movement felt its reverberations.  Even Kevin Jennings.

In 2003 I was deputized by the State of Kansas to ride with Attorney General Phill Kline as chief of his Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division.   The Culture of Death called for my immediate termination from that high governmental post and their hate was echoed in the Kansas City Star and Wichita Eagle.  Four years later I was the focus of the politics of personal destruction as the Left spent a reported $250,000 on a television ad painting me as a common criminal for my pro-life activism and resulting arrests.

I had been admitted to the Kansas bar in 1996, had passed character and fitness review in Montana in 1996 and in Missouri in 2006.  I had been admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States in 2001 and passed character and fitness review after the professional scrutiny of the National Board of Law Examiners in 2005.

Yet when I applied for a law license in Indiana in April, 2007, a process that should have taken six months at the most dragged on for 31 months.  I tendered more than 70 uncontroverted witness statements as to my good moral character and fitness, including statements from an Auxiliary Bishop of the Roman Catholic Church, two former attorneys general of Kansas, and many other nationally recognized persons. This process was dragged out for 23 months and finally ended (round one) with a February, 2009 vaguely worded decision that I lacked what it took to be certified as of good moral character and mental fitness in Indiana.

That order referenced no facts and contained no law.

I asked for a hearing and one was set for June 1, 2009.  (round two)

Over the next few days some of that hearing transcript will be posted for all to see the focus of the Indiana Board of Law Inquisitors.  Meet the Inquisitors at this post.  

Read what follows and weigh the facts for yourself:  Was it my religion that bothered these Grand Inquisitors of post modernity?

Or was it just my human life activism, including returning to Fort Wayne to set up the ArchAngel Institute in the very former abortion clinic that sued me out of existence two decades earlier — and reopening that judgment and prevailing some 20 years later?   (Click here for more on that historic victory)

The Left has many, many reasons to hate me.  But that hatred is not supposed to keep me out of the State bar.  It has.  Stayed tuned for proof.

We viewed such scenes of late in Haiti and Chile.  The Pacfic Rim is trembling, and earthquakes seem to be increasing all over the world.

Consider the New Madrid fault. It went off in the early 1800’s and the ground in the midwest rose in three foot waves. 

The Mississippi River dropped for three days as a thirty miles tear in the Earth — Reelfoot Lake in Tennessee — filled up.  The New Madrid fault created that lake.  The quake ran church bells in Boston.  It was a monster quake, in part due to the soils of the Midwest.

Were it to hit tomorrow Evanville and Indianapolis (pictued) would be smokng ruins.  Imagine life in a twenty  story building with the ground heaving in three foot waves.  It would probably be a frighten one or two minutes until the entire building fell over sideways and exploded into a billion pieces of glass, bricks and steel.  Or perhaps it would merely telescope in on itself like the Twin Towers on September 11. 

Those under marble domes and in modern cement buildings would fare no better.  Would one have time to repent of lies, injustices and other evils when the walls came a tumblin’ down?  Maybe, especially if trapped in an pocket for a few nights hoping that the aftershocks did not bring all of the rest down on you.  But one should probably not count on the time to “get right with God.”  One should do that now, and not presume upon Divine Grace.  Today is the day of salvation – it may be your only day, in fact.

Here are some links on the subject of acting on Jesus’ warnings in today’s Gospels.  Many believe that America is overdue for judgment.   If God did not spare Haiti, did not spare Chile, will he spare the Midwest if the New Madrid fault is scheduled as the next big eruption?

Something to think about when entering modern structures made of heavy rock, steel and glass.   Are you ready to meet your Maker and explain your life to him? 

Here are some posts that might help you think it all through.  What really matters when all the world quakes?

http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles-2009/Reardon-Now-Is-The-Day-Of-Salvation.php

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/real-pain-real-victims-real-sad/

http://www.rachelsvineyard.org/a-message-from-our-founder-Dr-Theresa-Burke.htm

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/like-a-key-in-a-lock/

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/he-is-risen-indeed/

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/the-institute-trusts-in-the-risen-lord-of-history/

p.s  Tomorrow at 4 pm is the begining of the postings of the transcript from my June 1 hearing before the Board of Bar Inquisitors.

Besides the three top statewide leaders of Kansans for Life as close friends I also treasure the leaders of the “rival” group, Right to Life of Kansas, as friends.  Elmer and Audrey Feldkamp run that operation, with help from great Kansans like Pat Turner and Margaret Mans. 

We have posted a note from my Topeka-based National Right to Life affiliate activist Kathy Ostrowski in the past.  Here is Anne’s guest posting with a note from Kathy embedded.  Kathy runs the show with Mary Kay Culp and David Gittrich and was an eyewitness as to my Kansas years with Kline.  (Gittrich was with me, and me with him, during the Wichita years).  All three of the well respected Kansas pro-life leaders have written to wish me the very best on my cases against the New Age Inquisitors of Indiana.

Kathy is married to an attorney and is a very bright gal.  She works up legislation for the Movement, and has shepherded some fine work through the Kansas political process in her day.

Thus it means much when she gives a compliment.Here is what she wrote me a few hours ago:

 I spent some time this afternoon reading your SCOTUS submission. It is brilliant! All of it is exceedingly clear and the last 10 pages are quite riveting. Well edited. IS Prof Rice making contacts … How about people like Ed Morrisey & Hadley Arkes, etc.? ——— Westerhaus was on OReilly (Wed I believe), who tried to take her down about Focus ad, says Mary Kay who has cable TV

Thanks, Kathy!

btw, readers, click here to visit Kathy’s fine work for the National Right to Life.  (Same group that Allen County Right to Life reports to, although ACRTL is not the statewide affiliate.)  The picture of my old neighbor (Kathleen Sebelius) is a fine example of Kathy’s great work.

And so that it cannot be said that I do not treat my local NRTL affiliate the same, here I am saying nice things about Cathie Humbarger as well.  Here and here and here    More on that later.  (Oh, and I have already received vibrant encouragment from Wendell Brane, my old partner in loiterings and trespasses — the kind that the Culture of Death  can never forget or forgive.

The times, they have a-changed.

Focus on the Family has been banned from advertising on the NCAA website because their traditional views on marriage do not celebrate a gay old time.

Charlotte Westerhaus, the Bar Examiner who led the charge against my Indiana application is the hand behind the Focus ban.

She and her cohorts, the other Inquisitors, banned me from even applying to the Indiana bar for admission again for five years!

Child molesters are banned for two years.

As I posted here, I have stood up to the “gay old time” in the past, and had reason to believe it worked against me with the Indiana bar examiners.  This is traceable to Dr. Elizabeth Bowman, the government’s chosen expert against me, traceable to Charlotte Westerhaus, and traceable to one other actor  in this passion play.

The Focus banning is much more circumstantial evidence supporting that allegation of homosexual rights politics at work.

Can one be banned from the practice of law due to what one believes?

Not if that belief is Marxism.   Here is the law on that. (Read Baird and then justify my ban from Indiana for ideological reason!)

But what if that belief is that a “gay old time” is morally objectionable?  Even against the Natural Law?

Can that ban Focus from advertising?  Yes, the NCAA has done just that.

Can that ban me from being an Indiana attorney?  If the SCOTUS does not take my case, yes.

This is political correctness on steroids.

Where does Charlotte Westerhaus get such ideas?

From her associates?   From her own experience?  From her own belief that she is to use all of her power to uplift the powerless and throw down the allegedly powerful?

Here is the bottom-line.  Charlotte Westerhaus and the NCAA have bought in toto the idea that advancing homosexual rights — the right to be free of any and all “discrimination” for their lifestyle choices — is a POSITIVE.   Being a person of action, Charlotte has taken action against those who oppose this view.

Thus what was once merely advancing African Americans to make up for past invidious discrimination — and stamping out the remnants of such discrimination has now become advancing all things “gay” for past invidious discrimination (read historic Christian teaching) against such celebrations and stamping out  discrimination  (read stomping traditionalist Christians)  against all things “gay.”

Thus Westerhaus’ direct  “action” against FOCUS on the FAMILY, and direct action against Bryan J. Brown.

The NCAA recently released a positional booklet on Diversity. Linked here.

This is the NCAA’s working definition of diversity under Westerhaus:

Broadly defined, diversity is any way in which
people differ. Of course, some characteristics among
people are more salient and symbolically meaningful
than are others. For instance, whether or not
one is left handed is not linked to the opportunities,
status, or work experiences that individual has,
while other characteristics, such as gender, race,
and physical ability, are. Thus, issues of historical
significance, power, and politicality are linked with
the concept of diversity.

That last sentence is telling.  Diversity is a social steamroller for Westerhaus.  History, power, “politicality” — they are all on the table when Charlotte Westerhaus is making the omelette (and breaking the eggs).

These thoughts are well demonstrated through a controversial program — a think tank — that Westerhaus and the NCAA helped to launch.

On Saturday morning in Presidential Ballroom B, a gay-themed panel titled “Time Out! A conversation about including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) student-athletes” took place.

The panel is the brain child of Pat Griffin, an advocate with the Women’s Sports Foundation. Griffin originally connected with Charlotte Westerhaus, the NCAA’s Vice President for Diversity and Inclusion. At Westerhaus’ urging, Griffin encouraged the creation of the panel and suggested the annual convention as the time and place to do it.

http://www.outsports.com/os/index.php/component/content/article/25/52-ncaa-panel-addresses-gay-student-athlete-issues

The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) had this to report:

The Convention’s official program described the discussion saying “The focus of this panel is to provide awareness of how homophobia adversely affects student-athletes’ well-being and the climate within athletics; disseminate effective strategies that responsibly address homophobia in collegiate sports; and share best practices currently used by NCAA member institutions.”

“For the NCAA to take such proactive strides and begin a discussion around the issues affecting LGBT students, one that isn’t happening in other arenas, is a great first step forward,” said Giuliano.  “Part of what we want to do with the Sports Media program at GLAAD is give greater voice and visibility to LGBT athletes, coaches and fans, so that we can begin to make real inroads into the world of sports through changing hearts and minds.”

*** Griffin originally planned a panel to take place during the 2007 NCAA Final Four.  Though it was not possible to host the panel then, the NCAA’s Vice President for Diversity and Inclusion Charlotte Westerhaus worked with Griffin to ensure the panel was a part of the Convention.

http://archive.glaad.org/media/archive_detail.php?id=4166

It has now become a position paper and action plan.  Westerhaus is listed at the end of the document as the NCAA leader:

Our major project since 2008 has been documenting the unconstitutional acts of Indiana’s Judges and Lawyers Association by our Executive Director, Bryan J. Brown.  He was “undercover” for about two years in that assignment  — he was in so deep that he did not even fully realize he was on assignment — how is that for covert!

You will find the documentation of his undercover ops recorded in the federal lawsuit denominated as Brown v. Bowman recently filed in the Northern District of Indiana.

Read down this page for more details.  A Constitutional Law Professor from Ohio has linked to the federal complaint for us.

Find other projects of the Institute in the categories on the right, including the remodeling of a former abortion clinic into The ArchAngel Institute and including our Fall seminar hosting Dr. Charles Rice on the campus of Indiana-Purdue University, Fort Wayne, where the good doctor explained the Natural Law in unique and well received symposium. 

We are the antidote to the poison called political correctness.

We are building a Culture of Life on the ruins of the culture of death.

We agree with the author of 1984 that “So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.”
George Orwell

Click on FRONT AND CENTER (above on the left) for access to all recent posts.  Categories at the right gather posts.

Contact information:  archangelinstitute@gmail.com  …  (260) 515-8511

Snail mail:  AI, 827 Webster Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 archangelinstitute@gmail.com

I post this now because I am pretty certain that the same conspirators who focused their collectivist efforts to deny me entrance into the Indiana bar are now plotting to destroy me for daring to set forth their “official” deeds in the federal court pleadings.  (Read the complaint.)

More  revelations and fireworks to follow, so stay tuned  . . .

IL Staff

Dawn Johnsen, nominated to be a key legal advisor for the president, was approved 12-7 along party lines by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Also, two of the three Indiana judicial nominees for the federal bench have gotten a green light from the committee.

ARCHANGEL INSTITUTE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED ON MS. JOHNSEN RIGHT HERE.   SOME COULD CONCLUDE THAT ALL THE PLAYERS ARE IN PLACE FOR QUITE A NICE LITTLE PERSECUTION.  CLICK HERE FOR MORE ON THAT TOPIC.

Follow the Ms. Johnsen link above to get to this story from LifeNews.com that includes this from last year:  ”

Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican, was part of a group of 63 lawmakers to previously ask Obama to withdraw the nomination and he sent his own letter today to further urge him to scrap Johnsen.

Declaring that Dawn Johnsen “is so against an unborn child’s right-to-live that she has labeled mothers-to-be ‘fetal containers’,” King says she is not the kind of person who should be providing any president with key legal advice.

“Nominating Dawn Johnsen to head the Office of Legal Counsel is an insult to pro-life Americans who are willing to work with President Obama to find common ground,” King writes. ]]> http://www.archangelinstitute.org/more-pro-abortion-zeal-out-of-indianapolis/feed/ 0