Archive for the ‘Lent 2009’ Category

He Is Risen Indeed!

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

Christians, by definition, believe that the Designer of the Universe entered His creation as a man.
Stop the presses, for that statement is among the most profound written on this site. The ancient Greeks found it patently absurd. (Acts 17) Modernists have called it a fairy tale. Every consistent Christian believes it to be so true as to be worthy of building his/her entire life upon it and even surrendering their life for it.
The Incarnation (God becoming man) and the Resurrection (God-Man destroying death) are the two central tenets of the Christian faith. Anyone “Christian” who rejects either is no Christian at all, but an impostor. All true Christians affirm both.
CS Lewis, among others, noted that Jesus’ teachings leaves His student with only three viable options: He was who He claimed to be, YHWH of the Old Testament, “the Lord,” or a conman, “a Liar,” or a total wackjob, “a Lunatic.”
Post-modernists seem to lean toward lunatic. Jesus needed psycho-therapy. The boys down at the Synagogue/Mosque tend toward liar, noting that his teaching about God contradicts theirs. Hey, that is why he was crucified in the first place!
Only the most intellectually vacuous try to argue He was merely a good teacher. What good teacher gets Himself crucified for false teachings? What good teacher claims to be the self-existent One from the Exodus narratives?
As for His teachings, both Jesus’ identity and authority hang on his resurrection from the dead. He taught such Himself.
Stop the presses, for that statement is one of the most profound on this site. If Jesus is risen from the dead, then all He taught is endorsed by the Power that can reverse the bane of Life, the final frontier, the greatest scourge in the Universe.
If He was risen from the dead then Jesus is who and what He claimed to be.
If He was not risen from the dead then He was either a liar or a lunatic or a lying lunatic.
That dichotomy is nothing but applied logical thought. Choose this day whom you will serve.
If Jesus was not risen then his body decomposed in some Judean tomb. And if in such a tomb, then the Jewish and Roman authorities, who wanted him dead and killed off many of his disciples, needed only produce that rotting body to strangle Christianity in the crib.
They did not, but they did persecute to death almost all of the disciples and entire generations during the early years of the Church. We have no record of any “cracking” and confessing to a con job. They courageously died for the proposition that Jesus lived. Their blood was the seedbed of the Church. They firmly believed that they served One who could deliver their lives back to them.
About 80 generations later I join billions in affirming that Jesus Christ truly was risen from the dead. I join them in the Church, the only institution on the planet that has proved it can withstand the ravishes of time. Our constitutional republic is pretty much done after a mere 10 generations. The longest lasting monarchical families of Europe came and went in less than 10 generations and the monarchy as a viable institution did not last much more than 20 generations. No institution known to man other than the Church has lasted 1900 years. The Church of the Risen King is still going strong despite sword, despite the black death, despite wars, revolution, economic transformation, dissent and far too many Judases within.
At the great risk of waxing subjectivist, I should also add that my personal experiences in life inform me that Jesus is risen from the dead. I approach the Divine Godhead in His Name, and have witnessed answered prayers. I have witnessed the moving of the Unseen Hand. I have “felt” His assurances as I walk through dark valleys. He comforts my soul.

Reason and experience both inform me that I am right as rain in affirming that Jesus is risen from the dead.
The “therefores” that follow this keystone historical fact are very consequential – especially on a fallen planet. Many, far too many, who claim the name minimize or ignore the therefores. That is the main reason our civilization is dying. Christians giving their Lord the kiss of Judas.
John Paul II had this to say about the crucial therefores:
“Christ’s Resurrection is the greatest Event in the history of salvation, and indeed, we can say in the history of humanity, since it gives definitive meaning to the world. The whole world revolves around the Cross, but only in the Resurrection does the Cross reach its full significance of salvific Event. The Cross and Resurrection constitute the one paschal mystery in which the history of the world is centered.”
Pope John Paul II, March 1, 1989. (Quoted in Rice, 50 Questions)
The Resurrection results in a world view that transcends this world.
Jesus was the Passover Lamb who taught that in seeing Him we see the Infinite One in the realms beyond this one. Jesus was the appointed Sacrifice that taught in knowing Him we know the Ground of All Being. Jesus was our redeemer who taught that He and the Father were one.
Jesus taught that your Creator is both Infinite and Personal.
And if He taught it, you would do very well to act upon it – today — for “God overlooked [ignorance of Him in the past] but now he telling everyone everywhere that they must repent because he has fixed a day when the whole world will be judged, and judged in righteousness, and he has appointed a man to be the judge. And God has publicly proved this by raising this man from the dead.”
Acts 17, Jerusalem Bible
Friends, seek the Risen Lord of History. Seek a personal experience with the Infinite-Personal. What search could be more crucial?

Want more on how reason can lead one to faith in Christ? Then buy this fantastic book: 50 Questions on the Natural Law: What it is and Why we Need It by Professor Charles Rice, Ignatius Press. ISBN # 0-89870-454-5
Click here for Dr. Rice’s award winning book! http://www.amazon.com/50-Questions-Natural-Law-What/dp/0898707501

Postscript:  Click here for more on the above painting

The voice of one crying in the wilderness

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Question: Is the Bishop of Rome indicting our social order as Judas-like in spirituality?

Source: Wireservices

Pope Benedict XVI’s Good Friday homily decried the rise of aggressive secularism in Western societies, warning them that they risked drifting into a ‘desert of godlessness’.

He used his Good Friday meditations to compare deliberate attempts to remove religion from public life to the mockery of Jesus Christ by the mob as he was led out to be crucified.

‘Religious sentiments’ were increasingly ranked among the ‘unwelcome leftovers of antiquity’ and ‘held up to scorn and ridicule’, he added.

‘We are shocked to see to what levels of brutality human beings can sink,’ said the Pope at an evening ceremony at the Coliseum in Rome.

‘Jesus is humiliated in new ways even today when things that are most holy and profound in the faith are being trivialised, the sense of the sacred is allowed to erode.

‘Values and norms that held societies together and drew people to higher ideals are laughed at and thrown overboard. Jesus continues to be ridiculed.’

CAN ANYONE WHO FOLLOWS THE PLIGHT OF BABY DOE AND THE RISE OF THE CULTURE OF DEATH IN THE WEST DOUBT THAT THE POPE IS RIGHT ON WITH THIS PROPHETIC ANALYSIS OF OUR CULTURAL DISEASE?

Baby Doe as a modern Christ figure, part 1

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Ecce Homo (“Behold the Man”), Antonio Ciseri’s depiction of Pontius Pilate presenting a scourged Jesus to the people of Jerusalem.

Isaiah 53:3

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

… rejected-”forsaken of men” [Gesenius]. “Most abject of men.” Literally, “He who ceases from men,” that is, is no longer regarded as a man [Hengstenberg]. (See on [851]Isa 52:14; Isa 49:7).

…man of sorrows-that is, whose distinguishing characteristic was sorrows.

…acquainted with-familiar by constant contact with.

…grief-literally, “disease”; figuratively for all kinds of calamity (Jer 6:14); leprosy especially represented this, being a direct judgment from God. It is remarkable Jesus is not mentioned as having ever suffered under sickness.

…and we hid . faces-rather, as one who causes men to hide their faces from Him (in aversion) [Maurer]. Or, “He was as an hiding of the face before it,” that is, as a thing before which a man covers his face in disgust [Hengstenberg]. Or, “as one before whom is the covering of the face”; before whom one covers the face in disgust [Gesenius].

***

Most theologies recognize a pristine innocence in the newly born. The Church remembers and yet mourns the “slaughter of the innocents” every December 28, click here and here for details.

Bloomington’s Baby Doe can be viewed as such an innocent and more. While the pre-Lent 2009 parallels that Baby Doe shared with our Lord rendered him, in the words of the Institute’s friend Bob Tippmann, a “modern martyr,” recently revealed parallels are even more profound. This is because the Indiana judge who ruled on Baby Doe’s initial death sentence has broken a 27 year silence to grant an interview on the case.

This interview is found on the front page of Indiana Lawyer magazine. It is an amazingly frank back and forth between one of the most powerful sitting judges in Indiana and that leading Hoosier legal periodical.

The article opens with this long silent judge assuring the reader, through reporter Michael Hoskins, that His Honor will never forget Baby Doe.

The article closes on an even more striking note, as his Honor not only breaks his own 27 year silence, but also reveals intimate details about Baby Doe’s family that grants His Honor’s fellow church goers what was once considered top secret information regarding the identity of Baby Doe’s parents and, as he dubs the child that they had after Baby Doe’s demise, “the rest of the story.

Such is the beginning and end of this paradoxical interview. While the judge decries that this one case has seemingly defined him and defined his career, he must have agreed to this interview and to an eight by four inch picture of himself on the front page of Indiana Lawyer with a caption that startles even the most callous among us. (see article at above links for the picture and caption)

As stated, the parallels to the Christ’s experiences and Christian theology are profound. Some of these parallels follow, with the text of the IL article in blue, Holy Writ in red and theologian’s commentary in green:

“It all began with a Bloomington’s Baby’s birth on Friday, April 9, 1982 — Easter weekend. ….. [who] lived for almost 7 days [with his defects].” IL

PS 22:10

I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother’s belly.

Geneva Study Bible For unless God’s providence preserves the infants, they would perish a thousand times in the mother’s womb.

“[His Honor] vividly remembers first getting a phone call at home about Baby Doe’s situation … The hospital’s attorney [sought] judicial intervention. Getting to the hospital after dark, he was immediately escorted to the … nurse-training room.” IL

“the parents and their attorney [were on] one end [of the training room] and the hospital advocating for treatment opposite them. They gave the judge a rundown, he said.”

“Everyone [then] left to give him time to think about it. They returned 4 minutes later.” IL

“The parents were given qualified medical opinions, and it’s up to the parents – not me, he recalled.”

His Honor voices second thoughts about how the “hearing” was conducted: “We had no legal books, no recording equipment, and I’d have been well advised to have more quickly gotten information beforehand so we could have had a better hearing not at the hospital” he said. IL

(see Luke 22:2; Mark 14:1). They held the Jewish trial at night hoping that Jesus’ supporters would be asleep and unable to protest his arrest. The Jewish portion of the trial had three separate phases: (1) an appearance before Annas; (2) an informal investigation by Caiaphas and (3) a condemnation by the Sanhedrin….The procedures of the Jewish leaders during Jesus’ trial were illegal. Jewish law required that trial for a capital crime begin during the daytime and adjourn by nightfall if incomplete.

Source:

“It was an interesting debate legally, morally, ethically, religiously, philosophically …. Who should make these decisions?” “In a society such as ours, those decisions should be made by parents or the individual, not the government.”

“Pilate saith to him: What is truth?” The Gospel of St. John 18:38

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

38. Pilate saith unto him, What is truth?-that is, “Thou stirrest the question of questions, which the thoughtful of every age have asked, but never man yet answered.”

…And when he had said this-as if, by putting such a question, he was getting into interminable and unseasonable inquiries, when this business demanded rather prompt action.

…[Pilate] went out again unto the Jews-thus missing a noble opportunity for himself, and giving utterance to that consciousness of the want of all intellectual and moral certainty, which was the feeling of every thoughtful mind at that time. “The only certainty,” says the elder Pliny, “is that nothing is certain, nor more miserable than man, nor more proud. The fearful laxity of morals at that time must doubtless be traced in a great degree to this skepticism. The revelation of the eternal truth alone was able to breathe new life into ruined human nature, and that in the apprehension of complete redemption” [Olshausen]

“The sum of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous ordinances is everlasting. ” Psalm 119:60

[His Honor] left the hospital and went home, learning Monday morning the baby remained alive.” IL

Readers, this was no state-sponsored execution in which the ACLU would fight for the condemned one’s life and the constitution assure that the killing was not inhumane or cruel or unusual. This was a private act of infanticide legitimated by and approved by the Indiana authorities.

His Honor’s decision put Baby Doe on a court-ordered six day crash diet of no nutrition or hydration. He was to die a horrible death, a death not unlike a death in the blazing Judean sun … for Baby Doe this was so much more than an “interesting debate.”

Psalm22:1

My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my groaning?

Geneva Bible commentary

(a) Here appears that horrible conflict, which he sustained between faith and desperation. (b) Being tormented with extreme anguish.

Psalm 22:2

Young’s Literal Translation
My God, I call by day, and Thou answerest not, And by night, and there is no silence to me.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

2. The long distress is evinced by-”am not silent”-literally, “not silence to me,” either meaning, I continually cry; or, corresponding with “thou hearest not,” or answerest not, it may mean, there is no rest or quiet to me.

TO BE CONTINUED OVER EASTER WEEKEND … in honor of a baby boy who was born on Passover, 1982 and began his own passion over Easter weekend. (Like this year, those two holidays fell on the same weekend in 1982, a rare occurence.)

Just say no to tyranny

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

This post concludes the background on the legal infanticide of the Baby Doe case.  This post is, like the others that came before it in this past week, taken directly from our series on civil disobedience last summer.  See the June – August archives for more on this necessary topic.

Baby Doe was born on April 9, 1982.  April 9 is also Passover this year and Maundy Thursday  — a rare and unusual paring of religious dates.  Such significance!  Our Lord and Saviour celebrated Passover on Maundy Thursday and was crucified as the Lamb of God, the fulfilment of the Passover, on the next day.

On April 9, 2009 this site will present an interview with the Indiana judge who signed the papers and established the “due process” that paved the way for that baby’s painfilled demise.   We will present this interview devotionally.

For more on the Passover/Easter connection see our posts from Lent 2008.

We have been working with the Baby Doe event from two decades past as our example of good government gone bad. Numerous other examples could be sited, and will be in the posts to come. I am building on the Baby Doe order because it helped me in my formation as a Christian Activist.

Others have been inspired to consider the same by the example of Franz Jagerstatter, who refused to serve in the nazi army and was executed for his faith-filled answer of “Nein!” to the Uberstate. Click here for more on this man of great courage.

The Christian Church was not born to serve as a bastion of banality for lukewarm status quo social orders. In its worst years it has been pressed into such service, but that is not the intent of the Church’s Head, Jesus the Christ. He calls His Church to engage on social issues, for social issues are issues of Faith.

The Church is to preserve what is best in any social order, which is to say that which is in keeping with Natural Law, and to confront that which is raised up against Natural Law and the Revealed Will of the Creator.

Examples are not difficult to come by, although they are, at times, difficult to agree upon. If the Church was left behind without leaders with true authority then the plan was a recipe for disharmony and disunity.

Thankfully the Church has been graced with offices and leadership.

So has the government. But what happens when leadership fails to follow the Natural Law or the Revealed Will of God?

What is the Christian to do when ordered to assist in wrongdoing?

Like any and all Christian nurses and doctors ordered to ignore the cries of Baby Doe.

Here is the ancient and accepted teaching of the Christian Church:

399.
Citizens are not obligated in conscience to follow the prescriptions of civil authorities if their precepts are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or to the teachings of the Gospel.[820] Unjust laws pose dramatic problems of conscience for morally upright people: when they are called to cooperate in morally evil acts they must refuse.[821] Besides being a moral duty, such a refusal is also a basic human right which, precisely as such, civil law itself is obliged to recognize and protect. “Those who have recourse to conscientious objection must be protected not only from legal penalties but also from any negative effects on the legal, disciplinary, financial and professional plane”.[822]
It is a grave duty of conscience not to cooperate, not even formally, in practices which, although permitted by civil legislation, are contrary to the Law of God
. Such cooperation in fact can never be justified, not by invoking respect for the freedom of others nor by appealing to the fact that it is foreseen and required by civil law. No one can escape the moral responsibility for actions taken, and all will be judged by God himself based on this responsibility (cf. Rom 2:6; 14:12).
*** End of selection from The Compendium of Social Teaching of the Church
Any and all Christians who participated in the killing of Baby Doe need to seek forgiveness from On High, for such participation was a “practice which, although permitted by civil legislation, [was] contrary to the Law of God.”
Unless, of course, Legal Positivism is the right system for America. If such is the case then there is no God, there is no absolute right or absolute wrong, and the dehydration of Baby Doe was the “right” thing to do. Furthermore, any who stood opposed to that legal process were flirting with small t treason. Just like the early Roman Christians.

Those early Roman Christians had to right to conscientious objection, said the Apostles. No such right, said the Empire. The Empire won in the coliseum but lost in history. Although the great grandchildren of those who triumphed over Roman paganism look to be rethinking all of the issues and look to be resurrecting the gory glory that was Rome.

Do pharmacists, doctors, lawyers, psychologists, judges, policemen, social workers and other professionals enjoy the right to object to participating in acts contrary to Church teaching in our current social situation? How about parents? Do they enjoy such rights? Yes, but not for long if the political correctness movement continues to push its “diversity of morality” platforms on a post-Christian social order.

Rampant Christian persecution could fall upon us all much faster than many realize.

Readers might want to bookmark the above Church teaching. It could come in quite handy in the years set before us.

Breaking silence

Friday, March 27th, 2009

While we had planned to not post during Lent, the recent front page of the DrudgeReport simply cannot be ignored.

We are quite proud of our Bishop, Bishop John D’Arcy of the diocese of South Bend – Fort Wayne.

He knows a culture warrior when he sees one.  President Obama has long been just that.  A neo-Marxist culture warrior.

Also on Drudge note that the late term abortionist George Tiller was acquitted of charges that he killed children in an illegal (i.e. wrong procedures on the sign offs filed with the State of Kansas — not that it is wrong to poison babies per se) manner.

The Institute’s former Executive Director, Bryan Brown, knows Mr. Tiller rather well.  They go way back to the Summer of Mercy. 

Bryan hopes that George realizes that the really big trial yet awaits him.  And probably sooner than he wishes. 

George Tiller and John D’Arcy.  What a set of bookends we have this Lent.

Where are you on the continuum of good and evil, friend?

“I know thy works, that thou art neither cold, nor hot. I would thou wert cold, or hot.  But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth.”

Revelation 3

Could it be that George Tiller (the cold) is looked upon with more favor in Heaven than American Christians who know what God desires but do not care enough to sacrifice time, talent or treasure to advance the same?   Pictured:  George Tiller “partying” at the Governor’s mansion with American Catholic Governor of Kansas and good friend of  President Obama, Kathleen Sebelius. 

Click here for more on the Governor.  

Lent is upon us and our prayers are complete …

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

The headline seems strange, since Lent is all about prayer.

But we truly have finished a prayer marathon at the Institute.  We now look to the Lord of History to fill our sails with wind in His good time. 

The ongoing daily prayer services that were kicked off on September 29 concluded at the Institute today, Shrove Tuesday.  We have prayed in the Orthodox tradition every Monday, in the Evangelical intercessory tradition every Tuesday, through the great hymns of the Faith on Wednesday, the Holy Rosary on Thursday and the Chaplet of the Divine Mercy every Friday for 20 weeks. 

Thanks to Father David Meizen, Gloria Carrell, John Brown, Dolores Torrez, Bill Baermann  and Theresa Joy Burkette for leading these prayers.  Thanks to Ron Wellman, Priscilla Lauer, Don Carrell, Bernie Brown, Deacon Mike and more than a few others for being frequent prayers with us.

And much thanks to Retta Kohrman for hosting the daily prayers and keeping them focused upon Jesus Christ the Lord and His grace and mercy.  We have asked for guidance, for provision and for deliverance.  We have asked for the Lord to reach out to George Klopfer and Susan Hill in His merciful love.

The catagories at the right contain some of our spiritual postings if you want to be so stirred during the Lenten season.  See especially Lent 2008 and Advent. 

THE INSTITUTE WILL NOW SEEK THE CREATOR IN STILLNESS.  WE HAVE DETERMINED IT BEST TO FOLLOW ANCIENT CHURCH EXAMPLE AND SPEND LENT IN SILENCE BEFORE THE LORD.  THIS WEBSITE WILL NOT BE UPDATED UNTIL EASTER.  THE INSTITUTE IS CLOSED AND DRAPED IN PURPLE.  THOSE SERVING THE CULTURE OF LIFE AT THE INSTITUTE ARE ENCOURAGED TO SEEK GOD’S FACE IN THIS TIME OF ABSTAINING AS THE BOARD OF THE ARCHANGEL INSTITUTE SEEKS TO KNOW GOD’S ORDERS FOR US IN THESE TRYING TIMES.

If you do not understand why we would close down for Lent then this article may be of some help:

What is Lent? 

                     In the Christian calendar, this is a 40-day period of penitence and self-discipline beginning on Ash Wednesday and ending with the service on Holy Saturday which marks the start of Easter. Sundays falling within this period are not counted as part of Lent but as days of normality, or even celebration, notably Mothering Sunday

. In medieval times, the rules of fasting were severe: on weekdays, meat, milk products, and eggs were all forbidden, and only one meal a day could be eaten; marriages could not be celebrated, and couples were expected to refrain from intercourse; dancing and entertainment were forbidden too.After the Reformation observing Lent as a matter of personal piety persisted, in milder forms, in the High Church sections of Anglicanism. The Victorian growth of Anglo-Catholicism, and the influx of Irish immigrants, made the concept very familiar; most people now are aware that ‘giving something up for Lent’ is appropriate, even if they do not do it themselves.

Source:  www.answers.com

MAY OUR LORD RICHLY BLESS YOU AS YOU SEEK HIM THROUGH LENT. 

THE NEXT POST ON THIS WEBSITE WILL BE EASTER MORNING.

MARANATHA, COME LORD JESUS!