Archive for the ‘Battles past’ Category

BREAKING NEWS: VICTORY IN FEDERAL COURT TODAY!

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

Judge William C. Lee has today vacated the injunction that he himself placed at 827 Webster Street eighteen years ago.  He was so moved by the Donegal Corridor, through president Berenice Brown, with a supporting affidavit from The ArchAngel Institute, by Board President Keith Brown, as well as a motion from Bryan J. Brown, defendant in the original action, with a supporting affidavit from John R. Brown.

Donegal Corridor was well represented by South Bend attorney and author/journalist/Afghanistan War veteran David Wemhoff , who is co-author of this work.

The federal court granted Bryan Brown’s motion in full, vacating both the injunction and the order of February 21, 1991 that saddled all three Defendants (Wendell Brane and one other) with the duty to pay the abortionists the devilish amount of $61,616.

The original litigation is discussed at this post and the post after that post.

In a nutshell:

1.  Brown, Brane and more than 1000 others took part in Northeast Indiana Rescue’s ’sit-ins’ at 827 Webster Street.  See, e.g. this post.

2.  The leadership (Browns and Brane) were hammered in federal court by slick NYC, NOW and ACLU affiliated attorneys using subsequently discredited legal theories that placed an injunction on 827 Webster Street keeping Brown away from the building.

3.  That same hammering resulted in a Feb 20, 1991 order that Brown pay fees directly to the abortion clinic.

4.  Brown pretty much lost everything and left the Fort for Wichita, where he confronted George Tiller, led a boycott shutting down on the nation’s largest abortionist training camps, did 68 days federal incarceration for civil contempt for refusing to pledge a sacred oath to a federal judge, and fell in love with the prettiest sidewalk counselor in Wichita, Anne Walker.

5.  Brown left Wichita for Regent University School of Law in ‘93, married Anne in ‘94, hired on as one of Don Wildmon’s constitutional law attorneys (American Family Association) in ‘96, had his first born son in ‘97, second son in 2000.

6.  Left AFA to become a Deputy Attorney General under Phill Kline in 2003.  Third born son in 2003, beautiful daughter in 2006, was strung up by George Tiller, Planned Parenthood and the Left during the campaign of 2006.

7.  Advised his father to buy 827 Webster Street in 2007, launched the ArchAngel Institute in 2007,  moved back to Fort Wayne in November, 2007.

8.  Redeemed the former abortion clinic from the ravishes of spiritual and physical neglect during 2008, fourth born son documented on this site December, 2008.

9.  Has fought quite a battle to move his admission into Indiana, (many posts herein) after having passed character and fitness review in Kansas, Montana, Missouri, before the National Board of Law Examiners and the United States Supreme Court.

10.  Has documented many seeming unconstitutional acts while in Indiana and launched an attack against the February 20, 1991 fees order after Donegal Corridor launched an attacked against the 1990 injunction at 827 Webster Street.

11.  Brown is “praising his Risen King and Sacrificed Savior for today’s victory in federal court and is planning more exciting court filings in the near future.”

JUDGE LEE’s RULING IS POSTED IN THE VAULT, FOLLOWED BY BROWN’S AFFIDAVIT AND OTHER COURT FILED DOCUMENTS. CLICK HERE FOR JUDGE LEE’s RULING. Email archangelinstitute@gmail.comto receive it in pdf format.

Send messages to the same address:  archangelinstitute@gmail.com

Write to Bryan J. Brown at 827 Webster Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802, where he will now be officing BY ORDER OF  THE FEDERAL COURT!!!

Leave any messages or congrats at (800) 399-4620.  Press quote for Bryan Brown is in green quotes above.

Coming soon ….. extended commentary by Anne Walker Brown

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Anne Walker Brown, wife of Bryan Brown, has been a patient and supportive wife since 1994.  Being married to Bryan is a test unto its own, but put on top of that the Left’s ongoing retribution against Bryan for daring to stand up to childkilling and for advancing constitutional governance and it all starts to resemble quite a cross to bear.

Anne was born and raised by faithful Catholic parents in Topeka, Kansas.  She was living her Catholic faith in Wichita when Bryan met her in 1992, the year after he departed Fort Wayne at the insistance of the residents of 827 Webster Street.  (See introduction category for the background)

Bryan often says Anne was the “prettiest sidewalk counselor in Wichita.”  He courted her for two years and married her in 1994. 

Anne has been quiet about ArchAngel and Bryan’s ongoing headwinds in Indiana, not speaking publicly since she defended her husband during the ill fated 2006 election.  That contest pitted Attorney General Phill Kline and Deputy Attorney General Bryan Brown against challenger Paul Morrison (a party switching sexual deviant, see google searches) and then Kansas Governor (now Obama appointee to HHS) Kathleen Sebelius and their moneyman, infamous abortionist George Tiller.  Tiller-Sebelius-Morrison set their phasers on “kill” and effectively ended Brown and Kline’s careers at law in Kansas.

Here is Anne’s letter (in red) defending her husband in the fall of 2006 when the howls of the Left became a cacophony of hatred.  After watching her husband being pilloried on the front pages and in television ads Anne finally was heard.  This is offered  as background to a new letter Anne has released that will be posted on this website in the week to come. 

You’ve all seen the TV ad run by the Morrison campaign about my husband Bryan Brown (Phill Kline’s Consumer Protection Chief with the twelve arrests). The ad intentionally withholds explanation of those arrests, and it’s come to our attention that one newspaper even printed that Bryan is a convicted felon, which is an absolute lie. I’m sending this e-mail out to friends and family for clarification. This is a letter to the editor that Bryan submitted to newspapers across the state, but we don’t know if it will get printed, and even if it does it may be edited down. Please do not hesitate to ask us questions. We welcome any opportunity to get the truth out about this, so please feel free to pass this information on to anyone interested. Love and Peace in Christ, Anne Brown

I am Attorney General Phill Kline’s Consumer Chief. I write in response to Paul Morrison’s allegations.Yes, I was arrested twelve times between 1988-1992. All were tangential to the peaceful efforts of the pro-life rescue movement. Most were for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and, along with hundreds of others, refusing to leave. Most of the charges were city ordinance violations, which are not even misdemeanors.
Yes, a lower federal court in Indiana did order me to pay $61,000 directly to an N.O.W. sponsored legal team fifteen years ago. The injunction-winning abortionist attempted collection at first, but after the legal basis for the judgment was overturned by the United States Supreme Court all efforts were abandoned. That overturned judgment has been uncollectable for many years.
Yes, I have led a team effort to reform the Consumer Protection Division. Over the past years the division engaged in many investigations that were not proper under the law. The actions were, in a word, unconstitutional. While Team Kline has set records on the filing of enforcement actions and on educational efforts, Team Kline has stopped investigating complaints that contain no allegation of consumer fraud. Those who believe that government agencies should be tightly managed to do only that which is authorized will find the reforms of Team Kline inspiring. Those who believe that the “nanny state” should address every consumer complaint (regardless of merit) will find Team Kline’s reforms quite disturbing. I encourage all taxpayers to read about Team Kline’s reforms at www.ksag.org .

Ironies abound in this election season. Here are four of my favorites:           

 
#1. Paul Morrison has spent $200, 000 in a bid to paint me as a criminal for actions I took at the same time that he was (allegedly) sexually harassing Kelly Summerlin. Yet he claims his case is too stale to be relevant.

 

#2. Many of my arrests ended in not guiltyverdicts as a result of my pre-law school constitutional arguments. A few were settled against no contest pleas. A few were dismissed. Only one resulted in a conviction. Yet District Attorney Paul Morrison cries foul when the merits of a sexual harassment case he lost at the summary judgment stage are discussed.

#3. I am widely criticized for not respecting city ordinances enough due to my arrests. But when I post a report demonstrating that former AG Stovall (whose tobacco litigation reveals the degree to which she valued cronyism over justice) was operating her Consumer Division in a manifestly unconstitutional manner, I am criticized for taking state law too seriously.

#4. My pro-life arrests were a byproduct of my Christian values. Those were formed as I followed the lead of a good many Catholics and Catholic clergy, including Bishops. For those loiterings and trespasses I am roundly criticized by Paul Morrison — who claims to be a leader in the Catholic Church while striking a Faustian bargain with the abortion industry to become the next Attorney General of Kansas.I hope these ironies are not lost on the good people of Kansas

Bryan J. Brown 
 
Postscript:  No Kansas paper printed Brown’s letter in its entirety.  Almost all were in the tank for Morrison and would print nothing bad about him.  Steve Rose’s Johnson County Sun even went to so far as to print out and out lies about Brown, and then issue a vague and meaningless page 10 retraction after the election was lost.  Kline lost the election, Brown was immediately fired by Morrison, Morrison had to step down a year later as a result of a very distubing sex scandal in his office (and even in judges’ chambers), and the Institute was launched in the wake of it all.

Kline is still fighting for his legal life in Kansas, as he likely will be for the next three years or more. 

Being actively pro-life has its benefits, and especially if one enjoys persecution at the hands of the Left.

More on that subject in Anne’s letter to come.

Holy ArchAngels pray for us!!! 

 

 

Open Mouth, Remove All Doubt (post 2)

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

 This post is a rebuttal. Click here to read the previous post in this series.

Randy Terry the self-proclaimed prolife potentate

 Is has been my first hand observation that the unmitigated gall of Randy Terry is without limit. 

I first met Randy Terry in New York City in 1989.  He was a young firebrand of a pro-life leader who led the charge with much bravado while demanding that those who believe abortion is murder act like abortion is murder.

His message was simple, direct and called for personal sacrifice.  He lambasted those who stood against his crusade.

Randy’s message spread like wildfire, and within a few short years 50,000 Americans had risked arrest.  I did so numerous times. The movement blessed Randy with millions of dollars and two houses before it was shut down by the concerted efforts of the federal government and the abortion industry.

No one can deny Randy a place in the pro-life history books.  Some go even further and dub him a poster child for culture war profiteering. 

Years later Randy, like me, joined the Roman Catholic Church.  He and I had discussed a Romeward journey a few times over the years.  Randy had even called me when he heard that I was joining the Church and attempted to talk me out of it –  to no avail.  I joined the Church in 1994 after reading Veritatis Splendor.  (I could do nothing else!)  Many years later Randy also “came home to Rome.”

I always wondered if one as self-directed as Randy could really become Catholic.  I believe that recent events  have answered that question.

Randy Terry recently  announced plans to enter into the diocese of Bishop John Darcy to protest Notre Dame’s regrettable decision to host President Barack Obama on campus.  (The visit and dialogue does not trouble me, it is the honorary law degree that violates their Catholic charter as I see it.) 

Randy’s bravado was met with a direct and immediate cease and desist order from the diocese of Fort Wayne- South Bend.  If Randy remains protestant then he is free to give such orders about as much consideration as he granted federal court orders protecting abortion clinics “back in the day.”   If Randy is truly Catholic, however, then such an order should give him pause.  Great pause.  As Saint Ignatius of Antioch taught (capturing the essence of the Church Fathers) Catholics give glory to God when they obey the local Bishop. 

This rule of obedience is robustly tested when we are asked to obey while we yet disagree with the local ordinary.  (See Father John Jenkin’s predicament as a fine example.)

If Randy gave Bishop D’Arcy’s injunction any pause at all it  was not evident in his recent column in the Journal Gazette.  Randy instead launched into this fine and honorable Bishop with the very same vitriol that has defined his bombardment of abortionists and abortion protecting judges.

It was both friendly fire and pure showmanship.  Randy proving himself the ringmaster of his own personal circus.

Bishop D’Arcy has, in the unyielding private judgment of Randy Terry, denied Christ and apostated from the truth once given.  (The good Bishop merely disagrees with Randy Terry on a tactical matter, something that many of Randy’s ex-friends did — but usually only once or twice.)

Randy’s invective reveals the shallowness of his Catholic conversion.  Turning Rome on its head, he accuses this direct agent of the fisherman of being a traitor to the faith, of being Peter before the cock crowed instead of Peter after the Holy Spirit’s indwelling.

Like the most rabid of cultists, Randall accuses Bishop John D’Arcy of denying Christ three times.

Mr. Terry finds great irony in the Bishop’s Good Friday rebuffing of Terry’s self-annointed strategy to turn the Notre Dame graduation into a so-called “circus.”  I find profound irony under other those big tops.  But not the same irony that Randall spotted.

Irony #1

I was in Wichita, standing against George Tiller’s unspeakable brutality and Judge Patrick Kelly’s statist injunction, when Randy stopped by just long enough to take up a few collections.  The priest (now Auxiliary Bishop) James Conley who received me into the Catholic Church years later witnessed Randy’s faith firstand.  When the federal judge ordered the Operation Rescue leaders arrested  Randy fled the city before sundown.  I know, I was there and I stayed, facing down the activist judge alone.   After 68 days of unconstitutional incarceration the judge relented and I was set free.

Such irony – Randy, who denied Christ by running from a federal “Pilate” in Wichita now finds in Bishop John D’Arcy’s well meaning call for prayers and student led dialogue a capitulation to “Pilate.”

Irony # 2

Randy Terry tried to make contact with me about two years ago.  The rumor mill reported that he was out of cash and looking to get back into the culture war profiteer business.  (Click here for more details on that profession.)  I took a call from a mutual friend who asked me to renew my relationship with Randy now that we were both “in the Church.”

I informed my friend that I would not make amends with Randy until I first heard from the woman that he divorced, Cindy.  Randy and Cindy stood together through thick and thin for many long years.  Cindy was my friend, and Randy “put her away”  after “falling in love” with the babysitter/secretary who aided he and Cindy during one of Randy’s numerous ill-fated political stints.  It was reported in the Christian press (World Magazine) that Randall Terry flat out abandoned Cindy and their minor children.

Randy did seek me out a year later.  He was unable to arrange the call from Cindy and so our relationship was not “rekindled.” 

Such irony – Randy, who denied Christ by turning “Judas” on the wife of his youth and his own adopted children now comes to South Bend to accuse Bishop John D’Arcy  of being a Judas  – despite Bishop D’Arcy having led (and is yet leading) the dissent against the president’s Notre Dame visit.

Irony #3

Finally we have the prolife potentate Randall Terry calling a Bishop of the Catholic Church into the confessional for failing to “follow biblical teaching” and for allegedly leading his flock into “the sins of omission and silence” and thus “abandoning Christ.”   

Did I already write  ”unmitigated gall?”

Such irony – Randy, who violates the heart of our Catholic teaching on humble obedience, has the audacity to allege that our good Bishop is in need of “conversion and restoration” simply because he disagrees with Randall Terry on how to best protest the president’s visit.  Randy’s remonstrating against the local ordinary  merely demonstrates that Mr. Terry’s own Catholic conversion was no more sincere than Peter’s pre-cock crowing denials. 

Or no more sincere than Father Guido Sarducci’s Roman collar.  (See hyperlink at the above picture of Randy attempting his best Joe Scheidler impression.)

It would appear that Randy did not join the Catholic Church to be a layman but rather joined up to be our first American pope.

I am pleased to note that we already have a German Shepherd in Rome far more genuine and thought out than Randy Terry can ever be.  And a fine Irishman here at home, to boot.

Randy’s telling protestations against Bishop D’Arcy bring to mind a practice of Roman soldiers at the birth of the Church.  It is said that many of them, upon being baptized, allowed all but their swords to be immersed.  Their hearts went to the Risen King, yes, but their swords remained ever loyal to Rome.  It would seem that Randy’s conversion to the Catholic faith was much the same.  His heart may claim some allegiance to Rome, but his pen remains loyal to only himself –  a culture war profiteer he remaineth still … and he doth protesteth too much as well.

Go home, Randy.  Notre Dame has a fine shepherd – one that does not shear the sheep for self aggrandizement or filthy lucre.   Go home, Randy   and allow the local ordinary’s orders to bring a godly resolution to the Church’s problem at the University of Our Lady.   Go home, Randy –  your plan to turn this serious matter into a “circus” has done nothing but revealed you as a catholic (small c) , classless clown.

I strive to ever practice what I preach:  I will be home when President Barack Obama speaks at Notre Dame.  My family will be in prayer while Notre Dame dishonors its Catholic heritage by honoring the most pro-abortion president in our nation’s history with a law degree.  (St.Michael the ArchAngel , defend us in battle….)  By so praying we will be obedient  to the Bishop that God has given us, realizing, through faith,  that following the local ordinary is our very best strategy for a godly result in this troubling situation. 

I invite both Randy Terry and Father John Jenkins to join me in this faith-filled strategy.

Bryan Brown was formerly a leader with NorthEast Indiana Rescue and a former associate of Randy Terry.  Brown  left Fort Wayne in 1991 (as a protestant evangelical) after being sued by the local abortion clinic (under a subsequently discredited legal theory), and returned to Fort Wayne in 2007 (as a Roman Catholic) to establish the ArchAngel Institute in the building that previously housed the abortion clinic that had driven him from his homeland 17 years earlier.   He lives in Fort Wayne with the beautiful wife and five children that the Lord gave him after leaving Fort Wayne for Wichita, Kansas  in 1991. 

Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

The Institute shares a rich history with both late term abortionist George Tiller and Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius.  Both have spent time and dollars in legal, political and social entanglements with the Institute’s founder, Bryan Brown.

Tiller was the reason Brown went to Wichita when he was driven out of Fort Wayne by the Culture of Death in 1991. 

Sebelius raised millions of pro-death moneys in 2006 to see Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline defeated.  Much of that money went into negative press and attack ads.  Bryan Brown, at that time a Deputy Attorney General under Kline, was targeted in many of those hit pieces.  It was the politics of personal destruction, leftist style.  Which meant, of course, that it was quite alright by the media’s standards of fair play.

Here are some links on theSebelius-Tiller ties to the ArchAngel Institute and its founding.

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/president-obama-yet-assembles-a-culture-war-cabinet/

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/queen-of-mean.html

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/thou-shalt-not-kill.html

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/tiller-sebelius-scandal-still-gathering.html

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/defining-what-is-appropriate-after.html

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/its-my-mansion-and-ill.html

http://bjbrownsblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/almost-dead-mans-son-almost-walking.html

And here is some breaking national news on the subject …

From the Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The head of the Republican Party called on President Barack Obama to withdraw Kathleen Sebelius’ nomination as health secretary unless she answers more questions on abortion.

Senators scheduled a final vote on Sebelius for early next week and she was expected to win confirmation.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steelesaid Thursday that Sebelius, the Democratic governor of Kansas, has not been forthcoming about her ties to a Kansas abortion doctor, George Tiller.

“Significant questions remain about Gov. Kathleen Sebelius‘ evolving relationship with a late-term abortion doctor as well as about her position on the practice of late-term abortions,” Steele said in a statement. “If Gov. Sebelius and the Obama administration are unwilling to answer these questions, President Obama should withdraw her nomination.”

***

Sebelius was approved by the Senate Finance Committee this week with just two of 10 GOP votes. Several Republicans, including the top committee Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, raised concerns about her initial failure to disclose to senators how much campaign money she got from Tiller.

When the discrepancy became public Sebelius acknowledged getting an additional $23,000 from Tiller and his abortion clinic beyond the $12,450 she initially reported. She apologized and said it was an inadvertent error.

***

Sebelius told the Finance Committee that she personally opposes abortion, but she also has a long record in Kansas politics of supporting abortion rights. She’s repeatedly vetoed legislation sought by anti-abortion groups to impose more regulations on abortion clinics and rewrite the state’s restrictions on late-term abortions.

Just Thursday, in fact, Sebelius vetoed a closely watched measure that would have required doctors performing late-term abortions to report additional information to the state. She questioned whether the bill could withstand a court challenge and suggested some provisions could lead to “intimidation” of health care providers.

Associated Press writer John Hanna in Topeka, Kan., contributed to this report.

 

More on the Baby Doe discussion

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

We are again addressing a recent article in the Indiana Lawyer, the “official organ” newspaper for lawyers and judges in Indiana.  This paper recently ran a very provocative front page interview with the Indiana judge who issued the order that caused Bloomington’s Baby Doe to starve to death.   Click here for the article.

Our recent posts on this subject began during Holy Week.  Click here to begin the series.

There will be a post #3 on the Indiana Lawyer article presenting an interview with the judge who allowed the dehydration death of Baby Doe back in 1982.

There are a few “rest of the stories” that make this series compelling.  We will present those in a final post later in the week.

But right now we pause to point out a very interesting rebuttal letter that the Indiana Lawyer printed in its latest edition.  The letter below ran under one of the Indiana Lawyer’s editorials slamming the Christian Right while lauding President Obama’s most recent choice for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as, to paraphrase, about the best thing since sliced bread.

The Indiana Lawyer is showing its pro-judge, pro-leftist colors in full.

More on the subject of left wing journalism and Obama’s court packing plans later at this site. Rest assured that Mr. Obama’s plan is to pack the federal judiciary with judges every bit as committed to the cause as this executive branch nomination and this executive branch nomination.  (Note that the latter is closely tied to George Tiller and the former is closely tied to the pornography industry.)  While paying your income taxes does not appear to be a necessary precedent for serving in the Obama war cabinet, having paid dues to the far and radical left appears to be sure and certain prerequisite.

As stated, more on the ongoing preparations for culture war by Barack Obama and company later on this cite.  Read the above links if you doubt there is a master plan that is now in motion.  See especially this revealing tie to Hoosier fingerprints on Obama’s culture war preparations. (para 7)

But we digressed …

Today we continue our series on the legally killing of a handicapped infant with this letter to the editor from the Indiana Lawyer. 

(Clarying note:  the baby pictured above is from Darfur.  When that baby died the Left rightly decried the “ethnic cleansing.”  The left celebrates the “genetic cleansing” that caused Baby Doe to die the same death.)

Executive Director’s post July 4th post # 6

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

This post is another re-run preparing the reader for the recent front page story about the judge who ordered that Baby Doe not be saved from a death by dehydration.   I (Bryan) wrote a paper on this case while studying sociology at Indiana University, and have long considered it a watershed in Indiana law, and more so, social reality. 

I will soon present the recent story on the powerful Indiana judge at the center of this quater century old controversy and his recent statements on the case in the media.

But first more background is in order . . .

One of the ongoing discussions among those marching to decry the dehydration of Baby Doe was this question: “Would it be “wrong” to enter the hospital and take Baby Doe to a safe place where he could be given water, food and the simple operation needed to allow him to eat?”

This is a philosophical question dealing with the nature of human laws.

It would have been illegal. Kidnapping at a minimum. Just to enter the hospital after being told that protesters must keep their distance would have been trespass.

We neither trespassed nor “napped” the kid marked for state-approved dehydration.

We marched, we sang, we chanted, we protested.

He died.

But the discussion he started proved much more viable than his young body. Similar to John Brown of old, Baby Doe’s body laid “a moulderin’ in the grave” but his soul fired up a discussion that continued for many years to come.

Would it have been wrong to have broken the law to save Baby Doe from his painful, cruel and unusual fate?

If you say “Yes, it would have been morally wrong to break the law” then you might have elevated man’s law to divine status. If you say “thou shalt never break man’s law” then you are, knowingly or not, a legal positivist.

If you say “no, it would not have been wrong under the right circumstances,” if you believe that it would have been morally acceptable behaviour to kidnap that baby to save his life if it could be done in an orderly fashion, if you believe that it can be right to break man’s law to achieve a higher purpose than the law serves, then you are struggling with issues that may render you unfit to be a licensed professional in the State of Indiana. You are struggling with issues that caused the ancient Romans to hunt down and kill the early Christians. You are struggling with a Higher Laws paradigm, which all tyrants hate — for such teachings hold that the tyrant’s law is not the highest law.

So if you are such a person please consider, as an agent working for the government recently advised me, being “ever-so-careful” about how you are perceived.  You may make a career choice if you take the claims of the Christian faith too seriously.

It happened to our Russian cousins all the time when they lived under communism.

Back to Baby Doe:

It is doubtful that anyone who had acted to save Baby Doe would have ended up doing much time, but they would have been marked as an extremist for the rest of their natural life. Countless doors would have been slammed in their face for good.

Baby Doe, on the other hand, would have celebrated his 26th birthday this last Spring.

Would the “crime” have been worth “the time?”

Maybe we should ask “Brian,” the Down’s Syndrome “sufferer” pictured on the right?

More on this subject in the next post.

postscript:

Legal positivism is a conceptual theory emphasizing the conventional nature of law. … As an historical matter, positivism arose in opposition to classical natural law theory, according to which there are necessary moral constraints on the content of law. The word “positivism” was probably first used to draw attention to the idea that law is “positive” or “posited,” as opposed to being “natural” in the sense of being derived from natural law or morality.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/l/legalpos.htm

Executive Director’s post July 4th post # 5

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

The following story was first posted on this website last July.  A recent story in Indiana’s leading legal newspaper has brought Baby Doe’s life and death to the front pages.

This post helps set the stage for that interesting and breaking story.

Note that the anniversary of Baby Doe’s death is almost upon us.  It is Passover this year.

Bryan J. Brown here. I am still on the way to explaining my current situation with the Indiana authorities.

First more background. After attending Whatever Happened to the Human Race (FA Schaeffer and C.Everett Koop) I was hooked on Christian activism. I came home and took part in a Christian Activist “sleeper cell” operating out of the New Haven Baptist Church. Poor Pastor Gordon Smith had to put up with a group of us overzealous young Turks. But that is a whole ‘nuther story.

In 1982 the word went out that a newborn infant in Bloomington, Indiana was being starved to death by order of the hospital for the crime of being born with Down’s Syndrome. Actually it was a bit more complicated than that, and here is the explanation from doctors who know the score:

On April 9, 1982, an infant was born in Bloomington, IN with both Down syndrome and a tracheoesophageal fistula. Although closure of the fairly small fistula had a better than 90% chance of success, the parents chose to decline consent for the corrective surgery for “Baby Doe”. This choice was made based on a gloomy prognosis for the Down syndrome presented to them by one of the physicians involved. Other physicians and hospital administrators went to court to challenge the parents’ right to make such a decision. The judge upheld the parents right, and two appeals of the court decision failed. The infant died on April 15. In retrospect, most commentators believe this was a poor decision from a medical, legal, and ethical perspective.

Source Christian Medical and Dental Society.

During the six days that this little fella fought for his life I marched around that hospital with Joe Scheidler, Paul Brown (Judie’s husband) and about 75 others on two occasions.

I was just a 23 year old kid who never thought that the Indiana authorities would allow such an injustice to cause a baby to die such a horrible death. I figured that once the Court realized what was going on that justice would prevail for this helpless little baby.

It did not. We were in transition as a society: Not yet pagan enough to just set the kid out for the dogs to devour, like the ancient Romans were fond of doing, but still far enough away from our Christian roots to allow him to slowly die of so-called “natural causes.” (Like it is natural to ignore a screaming baby.)

Poor Baby Doe. Had we been more pagan he would have been killed more humanely. Had we been more Christian he would have been loved and cared for. We were in between and so he died the painful death of dehydration — while the “justices” of the Indiana Supreme Court nodded with stoic approval — the Platonic guardians of a new order in Christendom.

You do not hear of that happening much anymore, now do you? Don’t hear of hardly any Down’s Syndrome kids being born at all, in fact. Baby Doe survived the testing designed to catch such “defectives” and so met his tragic fate post partum. Most with Down’s Syndrome these days are caught much earlier and perish while yet in the womb. Often via a shot to the heart from George Tiller of Wichita, Kansas.

Abortion, it is said, is a backup plan for the contraceptive society. In the case of Baby Doe it was infanticide that was the backup plan for failed prenatal testing. As Planned Parenthood would say, “every child a wanted child.” Baby Doe was unwanted. As the March of Dimes would say, “every child perfect and healthy.” Baby Does was imperfect and unhealthy.

And so he was killed by order of the High Court of Indiana in the Spring of 1982.

My eyes were opened to the harsh realities of Indiana government as I marched around Baby Doe’s crib become crypt.

One of my favorite musicians later commemorated Baby Doe in song. It went like this:

Unfolding today
A miracle play
This Indiana morn
The father–he sighs
She opens her eyes
Their baby boy is born

“We don’t understand
He’s not like we planned”
The doctor shakes his head
“Abnormal” they cry
And so they decide
This child is better dead

I bear the blame
Believers are few
And what am I to do?
I share the shame
The cradle’s below
And where is Baby Doe?

A hearing is sought
The lawyers are bought
The court won’t let him eat
The papers applaud
When judges play God
This child is getting weak

They’re drawing a bead
Reciting their creed
“Respect A Woman’s Choice”
I’ve heard that before
How can you ignore
This baby has a voice

I bear the blame
Believers are few
And what am I to do?
I share the shame
The cradle’s below
And where is Baby Doe?

Where will it end
Oh
No
No

It’s over and done
The presses have run
Some call the parents brave
Behind your disguise your rhetoric lies
You watched a baby starve

I bear the blame
The cradle’s below
And where is Baby Doe?

Written by Steve Taylor © 1984 Birdwing Music/Cherry Lane Music Publishing Co., Inc./C.A. Music (ASCAP)

Here is Steve’s explanation of his song. (Click to order MP3)

“I must credit both the Christian philosopher Francis Shaeffer and Village Voice columnist Nat Hentoff for their influence and inspiration in helping me to develop a foundational belief in the sanctity of human life. Ten years after the events described in this song occurred, the alarm they and others sounded rings prophetically true. But it continues to be drowned out by the rhetoric of ‘freedom of choice’ and ‘quality of life’. A baby was born in Bloomington, Indiana with down’s syndrome, and despite numerous outside pleas for adoption, the parents, doctors, and ultimately the courts agreed to allow Baby Doe to starve to death, right there in the hospital. I began writing this song with the sense of outrage that fingers those responsible and demands justice. But the more I thought about what had happened, the more I realized that I shared in the blame — that my silence had helped clear the way for Baby Does’ suffering and death. Hearing this song again leaves me feeling empty and a little numb. In our democratic society, the battle for the sanctity of human life is being lost. And when that window closes, nothing will be sacred.”

May God smile upon you, Baby Doe. You died while the Indiana Supreme Court looked on, glad to insure that no one gave you a cold drink of water.

Click here for more on this case that taught me much. (I later wrote a paper on the killing as part of my undergrad in sociology from Indiana University.)

Thank God for loving parents

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

The ArchAngel Institute would not have been able to be born in the former abortion clinic were it not for the Donegal Corridor, LLC. The Donegal Corridor, LLC bought the building when it came up for sale. The Donegal Corridor bought the (downstairs) furnace and paid for much of the upgrades necessary to render the downstairs of the building habitable. (The abortionists had been using it without a furnace, with massive leaks in the roof and foundation, with unsanitary floors and sinks and kitchenettes, with walls that were painted a hideous blue and sickening pink. Yes, blue and pink. Come see the evidence, we now have it on display in the ArchAngel Raphael Room. How sick is that, a pink and blue abortion clinic?)

Want proof? Try this, and this, and here is another link on how the building was one year ago . . .

Want to know more about how the ArchAngel Institute came to be in a former abortion clinic?

Here is more on the Donegal Corridor …

and here

John and Bernie Brown are the principals of the Donegal Corridor. They own the building, not Bryan Brown nor Wendell Brane. If Bryan or Wendell owned it then Susan Hill or George Klopfer could grab it. The abortionists cannot take 827 Webster Street from John and Bernie. This is no ruse, for John and Bernie put up the funds, and they have carried the note with almost no rents and no return on investment for a year and a half.

The Institute honors and thanks John and Bernie Brown this Thanksgiving. They have advanced the Institute in a million different kindnesses, and they are greatly appreciated by the Institute.

We love you Mom and Dad.

p.s. Make that HIll and Klopfer would try to grab it from Bryan or Wendell. Actually that would prove quite litigious and very exciting. So, please, George and Susan, do come try. We are ready to return to court on your service of process. (As I have written you both and stated clearly.) Confused? Click here for context and Click here for more context.

Susan Hill In Her Own Words

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

Here is Susan Hill as she wants to be remembered . . . from this website.

Biography of Susan Hill

Professional:
1975 – Present: President of National Women’s Health Organization, a network of 8 free standing clinics and surgi-centers through the US specializing in gynecological and abortion services. Clinics are located in Columbus GA, Raleigh NC,
Ft. Wayne IN, Wilmington DE, Milwaukee WI, Fargo ND, and Jackson MS. Ms. Hill has been on the forefront of the national movement to provide abortion services to underserved areas of the country, and to keep abortion services available throughout the country.

1973-1975: Director of EPOC Clinic in Orlando FL, the first abortion clinic outside of Miami which opened right after the Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion.

1970-1973: Social worker in North Carolina and Florida

Education:
Meredith College, Raleigh NC. BA in Sociology / Social Work. 1970
A small S
outhern Baptist Women’s College

Legal Actions:
Ms. Hill and the National Women’s Health Organization have successfully sued the anti-abortion opposition over 34 times in Federal and State actions, and have never lost. Suits have been for false advertising, zoning ordinances, injunctions, etc. Her aggressive pursuit of legal remedies through the courts have kept the opposition at bay and has set important national precedents. NWHO clinics were the clinic plaintiffs in the landmark RICO case, Now v. Scheidler, against anti-abortion elements. This case was successfully litigated in 1998 and applied racketeering laws to anti-abortion extremists.

National Boards:
National Abortion Federation. Founding Member and Board Member. 1976-1981.
National Abortion Rights Action League. National Board Member. 1979-1984.
National Coalition of Abortion Providers. Founding Member. 1990-Present.

Honors and Awards:
North Carolina Equity 2000 Carpathian Award Nominee – 2000
North Carolina
Planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger Award - 1999
Raleigh
NOW Award - 1999
National Abortion Rights Action League Choice Champion - 1995
North Carolina NOW Equality for Women Award – 1994
Fund for Feminist Majority Feminist of the Year Award – 1994
NOW Unsung Hero Award – 1989

Television Appearances:
Donahue, Nightline, Sonya Live, C-Span, NBC Nightly News, BBC TV & Radio, 20/20, Belgian TV, ABC Nightly News, 60 Minutes, McNeil-Lehrer Report, PBS, CNN, CBS Morning News, CBS Nightly News, Freedom Forum (PBS), MSNBC, CNBC, Rivera Live, NPR, Dr. Laura.

Print Media:
Business Week, Time, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report, Wall Street Journal, Spin, Spy, Atlanta Constitution, Philadelphia Enquirer, Miami Herald, New Yorker, Glamour Magazine, Washington Post, Buffalo News, Chicago Sun Times, Chicago Tribune, USA, Boston Herald

Testimony:
Before Congress regarding the FACE Bill. 1993
Before Congress regarding enforcement of the FACE Bill. 1994
Before the FDA regarding RU486. 1996
Before Congress regarding RICO. 1998.

CLICK ON THE LINKS BELOW FOR POSTS ON HOW SUSAN HILL IS REMEMBERED IN FORT WAYNE and by PRO-LIFERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY:

Susan Hill pretty much brought “rescue” to Fort Wayne http://www.archangelinstitute.org/august-25-1989-remembered/

Susan Hill is a pioneer  among  proabort actvistists  http://www.archangelinstitute.org/exposing-susan-hills-hands-behind-the-scalpel/

Susan Hill is a persecutor of Christians: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/nuisance-litigation-steals-away-a-soldier/

Susan Hill can be a savvy proabort strategist: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/nuisance-litigation-backfires/

Susan Hill is a frivolous litigator (when the going is easy) : http://www.archangelinstitute.org/open-house-background-page-3/

Susan Hill is an inspiration for the institute:

http://www.archangelinstitute.org/open-house-station-three-the-mission-and-deeds-of-the-raphael-division/

Susan Hill  values profits over sanitation: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/why-we-march-part-three/

Susan Hill Left Fort Wayne to escape the law: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/abortion-and-the-annunciation/

NEXT POST; FINISHING UP OUR TRIBUTE TO SOLZHENITSYN

August 25, 1989 Remembered

Monday, August 25th, 2008

On August 25, 1989 hundreds of Christians gathered in the 800 block of Webster Street in Fort Wayne, Indiana to take a stand against the childkilling that had been taking place there since 1978.

More than two hundred risked arrest that day. The police did arrest 175.

It was the third rescue in 12 weeks during that summer of Christian resolve.

The three 1989 rescues (sit ins) in Fort Wayne were not as successful as hoped and they did draw down the full firepower of Susan Hill’s friends at the NOW and ACLU and other leftist public interest law firms …  legal crucifixions followed during Holy Week of 1990.

The sit-ins may not have resulted in a closed clinic, but they did model Christian resolve to stand for God’s law first and Christian resolve to stand as one, despite denominational disagreements going back more than 20 generations.

We at the Institute think that Alexander Solzhenitsyn would have approved.

August 25 is the 19th anniversary of what was probably the largest act of civil disobedience in the history of Indiana.

God, Family, Country. (Not the reverse, not ever.)

See the category “refuse, resist and/or rebel” for more on this subject.