Aux. Bishop James Conley has known me (Bryan) since 1991.  He is one of my spiritual advisers and has been for 18 years now.  He explains our shared background in this clip which he prepared for our December 8 banquet, before he knew for certain that the federal litigation would be filed.  He prepared a similar — actually even  more glowing — recommendation as to my good moral character and fitness and sent it to the Indiana Board of Law Examiners last June.  They ignored it.

I post this now because I am pretty certain that the same conspirators who focused their collectivist efforts to deny me entrance into the Indiana bar are now plotting to destroy me for daring to set forth their “official” deeds in the federal court pleadings.  (Read the complaint.)

More  revelations and fireworks to follow, so stay tuned  . . .

THESE ARE THE PLEADINGS FILED AGAINST THE MENTAL HEALTH INQUISITION THAT PRONOUNCED ME A HERETIC (FROM MODERNITY).  IT WAS FILED IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT DECEMBER 8, 2009.

NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE APPEAL FROM MY BURNING AT THE STAKE AS ORDERED BY THE ACTUAL BOARD OF BAR INQUISITORS AFTER THE INQUISITION LABELED ME MENTALLY ILL FOR TAKING MY CHRISTIAN FAITH TOO SERIOUSLY.  THAT ARGUMENT IS SET FORTH IN MY APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (Petition for Certiorari) FILED ON MARTY GRAS, 2010.  

SO HERE IS THE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE MENTAL HEALTH INQUISITION . . .

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23961843/Brown-v-Bowman-complaint-12-09

(See Exhibit B is you wonder if Brown really is sane enough to be a lawyer.  (Insert joke here))

“One’s beliefs have long been thought to be sanctuaries which government could not invade. [But some government agents demonstrate] the ease with which that sanctuary can be violated. The lines drawn by the Court between the criminal act of being an “active” Communist and the innocent act of being a nominal or inactive Communist mark the difference only between deep and abiding belief and casual or uncertain belief. But I think, that all matters of belief are beyond the reach of subpoenas or the probings of investigators. That is why the invasions of privacy made by investigating committees were notoriously unconstitutional. That is the deep-seated fault in the infamous loyalty-security hearings which, since 1947 when President Truman launched them, have processed 20,000,000 men and women. Those hearings were primarily concerned with one’s thoughts, ideas, beliefs, and convictions. They were the most blatant violations of the First Amendment we have ever known.”

BRANDENBURG v. OHIO, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, concurring

Oops, I did it again.  Dr. Stephen Ross, the psychologist appointed by Indiana’s thought police, the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program, warned me in person not to do it.  He then authored a report to the social worker processing my case, Tim Sudrovech, that he had concerns about me.

Concerns that I just demonstrated in the last post, thus “oops, I did it again.”  My apologies to Dr. Ross, Tim Sudrovech and Terry Harrell.

Dr. Ross tested me using the MMPI-2, and, I think, some questions that he threw in on the suggestion of his government handlers, probing my religious opinions and my political opinions.  They already knew me to be a pro-life, Reaganesque “teabagger”  -  and so probably thought it their duty to rough me up  — heckfire, I could be a domestic terrorist with that resume.

And rough me up Ross did.  (more…)

I have learned a valuable lesson through my processing, denial and effective seven year ban from the practice of law.  (Explanation:  After 10 years of successful lawyering — no disciplinary action taken against me — I have been denied entrance into the Indiana bar and told to not even ask again until 2014 — a full seven years after my initial application.)

The Board of Law Examiners released a 30 page ruling excoriating me for, among other modernist “sins” (more to follow) daring to take issue with Dr. Stephen Ross — a state-assigned psychologist who subjected me to a post modern inquisition using, among other devices of subjectivist intrigue, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Index II. 

I became even more the enemy when I pointed out that Dr. Elizabeth Bowman, the government-assigned psychiatrist,  shows signs of being an anti-Catholic bigot and has certainly authored articles and seminar materials against “the patriarchy” including this one arguing that persons of my faith expression belonged, er, shall we say “not in Heaven“  (see next to last paragraph) and appearing in a documentary where she charges that Catholic priests fabricated exorcism testimony.

WHO WAS IT THAT STEELED ME TO BE SO DARN HARD ON GOVERNMENT BUREACRATS????  (more…)

As previously reported, the United States Supreme Court failed to grant certiorari on the question presented here.  It was a long shot, a Hail Mary, and my only hope (outside Divine assistance) was from influential friends on the Christian Right helping make enough noise that someone near a Supreme Court clerk might hear of my “bomb in the air” and take an interest.  (The Left does this via ACLU press releases.  I did not ask the ACLU for help.)  I did ask the Christian Right for help.  Just publicity or “friends of the court” briefing.  My requests were ignored or denied for reasons that simply elude me.

We steam on with Brown v. Bowman, the December 8-filed case alleging unconstitutional processing at the hands of government social workers appointed to evaluate me for bar admission. 

Today I made a deadline for supplemental briefing on the question of motions to dismiss, turning in 40 pages of legal argument and more than 60 pages of evidence on this one issue:   Do the Defendants have a legitimate claim to absolute immunity?

All Defendants — the Supreme Court of Indiana, the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program Executive Director Terry Harrell, JLAP Clinic Director Tim Sudrovech, feminist fatale pop psychiatrist Elizabeth Bowman and the well-connected, confiscational psychologist Stephen Ross all claim that they simply cannot be sued for how they shuttled me through the government’s smoke-filled backrooms and harshly interrogated me under its glaring lights. 

According to the Orwellian team running the operation against me in the bowels of Indiana’s judiciary, (more…)

I had envisioned three posts memorializing the Titanic’s sinking this year.  I was able to write two of them.  The third would have been the most controversial and born of my own subjective interpretation of my current situation and the Californian-like responses that I have documented.   I decided it was too dark to post.  Maybe later, just before — or after — the breaking in half point comes.

I have two series in progress right now, the posts are numbered to keep them straight.  One, called “justice in post modern America”  is telling most all of the story of the past three years using recently filed documents (and more that will soon file).  It starts here. The other is dubbed “a post modern heresy trial” and that ongoing series recounts Indiana’s Soviet style “hearing” that was held as to my bar application on June 1, 2009 — the day after George Tiller was assassinated.  (Bad timing for me, worse timing for George.) It starts here.

Time for another overview.  I am sending this out to some in the Christian media.  You, reader, are hereby deputized:  Please send a link to anyone who might enjoy reading along as we await a rescue or the breaking of the hull on this good ship (or bad ship if you are the government) ArchAngel Institute.

I am the former Deputy Attorney General of Kansas (under Kline) who is setting up the ArchAngel Institute in the former abortion clinic in Fort Wayne.  Worldnetdaily covered my reopening of my 20 old case and prevailing last year.  Right here
 
I am working on a bigger story right now.  One of Christian persecution.  If you read through the posts that follow you will be walked through one the the best documented persecutions I have seen — and I litigated constitutioanal law for the American Family Ass’n from 1996 – 2003, and so worked on many alleged persecution cases.
 
Here is AFA’s take on my ongoing case:  http://www.onenewsnow.com/Journal/editorial.aspx?id=957120
 
Start here with an official transcript to whet your journalistic appetite: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/a-post-modern-heresy-trial-post-2-what-my-inquisitors-most-wanted-to-hear/
 
(See the category “heresy trial” for more from the hearing (the transcript of which was only recently made public)
 
Here is an overview of the legal proceedings:  http://www.archangelinstitute.org/review-we-are-tracking-two-independent-and-important-actions-against-the-forces-of-political-correctness-and-socialist-governance-in-high-places/
 
Here is the question that I presented at the Highest Court:   http://www.archangelinstitute.org/fighting-on-in-the-spirit-of-churchill/

The High Court den’d cert, but my case of official discrimination goes forward in fed dist court.  And may soon enter into discovery phase under a conspiracy theory. 
 
Frriday I rec’d a promising order suggesting that I may very will survive motion to dismiss and get to enter into discovery on my theory  of the case.  The government defendants have now turned in about 110  pages of briefing seeking dismissal against my 60 pages of briefing resisting dismissal.   I have asked for, and received, the opportunity to file supplemental briefing. 
 
Here are some posts on the persecution and my litigation theory: http://www.archangelinstitute.org/justice-in-post-modern-america-post-1/
http://www.archangelinstitute.org/brown-v-bowman-why-a-federal-lawsuit-against-the-indiana-judges-and-lawyers-association-jlap/
http://www.archangelinstitute.org/brown-v-bowman-persecuted-for-defending-the-good-word/
 
See the category “brown v bowman” for more on this pending  federal case alleging civil rights violations.  It has the potential of making quite a splash for truth, justice and the protection of natural law adherents.

“One of the things that the conservatives have always brought to the table in America is a reminder that no law can replace personal responsibility. And the more power you have and the more influence you have, the more responsibility you have.”

So intones former President Bill Clinton, voicing his concerns about tea party folks.

The robust exercise of First Amendment rights is scaring the Left into hyperventilation (of hot air), but the aggressive exercise of raw, unconstitutional governmental powers — well that does not bother Bill and his ilk one little bit.   This is the president who did not call his bulldog Paul Begala onto the carpet for quipping, “Stroke of a pen.  Law of the land.  Kinda cool.”

The Left finds such power kinda cool, especially when used to shut out their enemies.  I know that (more…)

“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA

Section 2. All people shall be secured in the natural right to worship ALMIGHTY GOD, according to the dictates of their own consciences.
(History: As Amended November 6, 1984).

Section 3. No law shall, in any case whatever, control the free exercise and enjoyment of religious opinions, or interfere with the rights of conscience.

Section 4. No preference shall be given, by law, to any creed, religious society, or mode of worship;
(History: As Amended November 6, 1984).

Section 5. No religious test shall be required, as a qualification for any office of trust or profit.

****

After Dr. Stephen Ross issued his enigmatic non diagnosis (as instructed by his government handlers, I allege in the pending federal litigation) I took the time to let the Indiana system know that my religion and my politics were NOT supposed to be at issue when evaluating whether I was to be admitted to their bar. I was thunderstruck that this seemed to be a debatable point, but it was. While neither Terry Harrell nor Tim Sudrovech of the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program — those who were choosing and pre-briefing the state mandated mental health apparatchiks used against me — did not directly tell me that they were empowered to weigh my politics and religion in the balance one did say just that. Dr. Elizabeth Bowman informed me that no area was off limits, including my religion. (More on her later.)

Dr. Ross has recently been appointed to monitor the mental health of Allen County’s deputy sheriffs. He bragged in the newspaper article about his ability to use questions added to standardized testing to ferret out malcontents. I have a hunch I tripped over a few of those, which is why, I think, my notes (the work product of a Kansas-licensed attorney) were confiscated by Dr. Ross. Repeated petitions to Ross and his handlers have not resulted in a return of those notes. Note that more than half of the questions found on the MMPI-2 are available in books at the library. Why would those notes, therefore, be so dangerous as to require confiscation?

Perhaps because the question that the memorializes were not on the MMPI-2? Perhaps because I was given an iteration of the MMPI-2 that is yet being developed to be used with the soon coming and very controversial DSM V? Perhaps because those questions added by Dr. Ross, maybe even at the suggestion of Tim Sudrovech or Terry Harrell, in a plan to cull me out for ideological reason?

I cannot share a copy of my confiscated notes. I seek them through the pending federal litigation. I can the appendix of a letter that I sent to JLAP — repeatedly — seeking an answer as to why my (more…)

“To endure the cross is not tragedy; it is the suffering which is the fruit of an exclusive allegiance to Jesus Christ”

This post is dedicated to Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, author of the above, who was executed on the order of Adolph Hitler for treason on this date in 1945.  More here.

I applied for the Indiana bar in April, 2007.  My application was one inch thick, mostly because I attached to it much from my application to Missouri, which had, just the year before, resulted in the Missouri Supreme Court and the National Confernce of Bar Examinershaving found me of sufficient good moral character and mental fitness to sit for the Missouri bar.  The Indiana Board, upon receipt of my file, immediately ordered the entire Missouri application, my previous Kansas application, my previous Montana application and added to it my previous Indiana application — this swelled my application to over 800 pages, and from that time forward the Bar Examiners complained of its size.  (Know that they could have granted me a presumption rather than order all of my past applications in a bid to catch me in a misrepresentation — which they never did.  Thus they were the proximate cause of the size of the application — which they repeatedly blamed on me.)

The Indiana authorities sat on my application for six months and then instructed me to meet with a state court judge whose husband had represented Fort Wayne’s pre-eminent pro-abortion activist (more…)

My processing through the Indiana Board of Law Examiners affords quite a study in postmodern justice.  One that I plan to continue to explore in depth on this website.

This series (Psycho-Justice) will layout the way in which the Indiana authorities used mental health agents to deny my bid for admission to their bar.  It is truly a study in the Orwellian use of psychologist Dr. Stephen Ross and psychiatrist Dr. Elizabeth Bowman by government agents Terry Harrell and Tim Sudrovech of the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program.  (JLAP is an euphemism for the Hoosier thought police.)

Another series (A post modern heresy trial) on this site recounts my June 1, 2009 hearing before the Indiana Board of Law Examiners.  In order to keep these two major threads untangled I am using alphas to demark the psycho-study and numerals to demark the hearing. 

Both threads take off from here, so hang on tight:

Professor Charles Rice submitted two glowing reviews of my character to the Indiana authorities and I dropped his name at my June 1 hearing.  (His glowing review, couple with more than 65 others, did me no good before the Indiana authorities, in part due to statist (even anti-Christ?)  thinking like this.)   After receiving a copy of my petition for Certiorrari that was received at the United States Supreme Court on Ash Wednesday, Charlie called me up and let me know that he did not think the High Court would take my case.

“Maybe if you were a bomb throwing Leftist,” he said, “but the way those petitions are thrown around and out the door you don’t stand a chance.”  

Consider that dramatic foreshadowing.  I did when he called.

Professor Rice was referencing such cases (hit the links for a briefing) as Konigsberg v. State Bar, 1957 and Baird v. State Bar of Arizona, (1971). 

My situation is most on point with one of the first Leftist cases, that being Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232(1957).  In fact, the Schware facts are strikingly similar to the facts animating my case.  I will explore that in greater detail in the next posts to come.

For those just tuning in, I am a human rights activist who is unapologetic in my adherence to (more…)