In the last post I stated that I did not know who authored the Board of Law Examiner’s final order denying me certification as to good moral character and/or fitness (the order is unclear as to which one).  It is true that the order was unsigned.  Hand dated by someone, signed by none.  Three names do appear on the document, but evidently none of those three deemed it worthy of their John Hancock.  (The henchmen of the Inquisition do prefer black hoods, see picture.)

Of those three hooded henchmen, one did get the report notarized as coming from the Board.  Now the notarization does not state that the report is believed to be true, and in fact the report contains many, many errors — so many as to cause one to think that they were put in on purpose.  (It makes the record much messier when factual errors plague a report, making the burden even heavier on the one appealing the report  – as any experienced appellate advocate would realize.)

The Vice President of the Board, Jon B. Laramore, signed the “fig leaf” attempting to cover the nakedness of an unsigned report.   His was the middle unsigned line on the report.  The third unsigned line was for Board President and Walmart attorney Leslie C. Shively.  Attorney Shively was both the Board President and Hearing Panel Chair — yet did not see the need to sign the final report.  Must be how its done in Bentonville?

The first line, customarily the line reserved for the author of any report, was also unsigned.  That line was reserved for Charlotte Westerhaus, who offices just around the corner from the IBLE offices.  She is a Vice President for the National Collegiate Athletics Association.  (Stay tuned for more on that.) 

Thus no one signed that the report was true and not filed for any untoward purposes.  Interesting, no?   Read on more more … (more…)

Yes, secularists have creeds, too.  Just ask Stalin or Mao or Castro. 

Or ask the Indiana Board of Bar Inquisitors … or, as they prefer to be called, the Indiana Board of Law Examiners.

Here is their creed … note that it trumps all conscience clauses, and thus trumps religion.

(more…)

Just above Monsignor Lester’s death notice (RIP)

Pro-life attorney wants review of case

“A Fort Wayne pro-life activist who claims he was denied the opportunity to practice law in Indiana because of his orthodox Christian faith has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case. Bryan Brown filed in U.S District Court in Fort Wayne in December, alleging that Indiana Board of Law Examiners and others barred him from taking the Indiana bar exam after questioning his character and fitness to serve as an attorney – questions Brown claims were based on his belief that Christians should put God’s laws above human laws.

Brown, founder of the Arch Angel Institute in Fort Wayne, has been arrested or fined several times for pro-life activities. The high court should intervene, Brown argued, to prevent would-be lawyers from being forced to profess a secularist creed that violates their First Amendment right to freedom of religion.”

Stay  tuned for more on the federal district court filing of Dec 8 (against JLAP, Harrell, Sudrovech, Ross and Bowman) before US District Court Judge Theresa Springmann and the Fat Tuesday filing (against the Board of Law Examiners)  before the United States Supreme Court.  Two distinct federal cases seeking far different recoveries.

As stated in the last post, Fate has afforded me only one path forward.  (Since The Institute has no reverse gear.)

“We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and the oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.”   Winston Churchill

PRAY WITH US!!!  Hope springs eternal in one with the correct perspective.   LOOKING FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT POST ON THIS SITE?  MOST REVEALING?   CRUCIAL?  THE KEY TO UNDERSTANDING THE INSTITUTE AND BRYAN J. BROWN.   ( Then click right here)

Today, Ash Wednesday, was the final day for me to file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court as to the Indiana Board of Law Examiners’ refusal to admit me to the Indiana bar, and effective seven year ban, against this declaration:

“He testified [as] to his obligation to disobey laws that contradicted his religious beliefs under certain circumstances. [He further] indicated that he would not obey certain court orders and judgments  that he believed to be unjust.  [It is the policy of the  Indiana court]  that a member of the Indiana bar must obey Indiana law and federal law, even when doing so violates an attorney’s conscience, and that an avowed willingness not to do so is disqualifying.”  Board report at pp.29-30.

While almost every Christian public interest group, policy or law, is busy raising moneys off the much trumpeted Manhattan Declaration, I wrote to almost every such group asking for help in my struggle to get this question before the United States Supreme Court.

I wrote most all of the “culture war” parachurch nonprofits before I even filed against the WHO last summer, seeking help on that case and my struggle to get licensed.  None were interested. Some wrote to advise me that I could not win my cases.  Since then we won two out of three.   (Including against the IRS, here.)  

Neither were any of the Christian Right groups willing to retain me, work with me or otherwise help me provide for my wife and five kids while I threw everything I had at the Indiana bar application process, including setting up the above question for the United States Supreme Court.  Most merely ignored my letter setting forth the ArchAngel Institute’s birth, the great victory last August , my family’s great needs and my intent to press the case against the Board of Law Examiners, JLAP and Indiana Supreme Court as far up the system as it could be pressed.

Just ignoring my letter struck me as rude — even cruel — given that I asked many that I knew personally to write me with some advice.  I guess I was ignored because my letter included the faux pas of asking for financial aid, among other things.  It evidently is not all that nice to share, and especially with cultural warriors twisting in the wind.  I mean, it is not like my family is really needy or anything  — they only suffer because I stood up to the Culture of Death twenty years ago to such as extent that I made Susan Hill’s top five to hate list.   Click there for her report on the Daily  Kos — she and Anne Rose have posted it twice to their Hot Flash blog.  I am a marked man.

If only the Right loved me half as much as the Left hates me!   (more…)

THESE ARE THE PLEADINGS FILED AGAINST THE MENTAL HEALTH INQUISITION THAT PRONOUNCED ME A HERETIC (FROM MODERNITY).  IT WAS FILED IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT DECEMBER 8, 2009.

NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE APPEAL FROM MY BURNING AT THE STAKE AS ORDERED BY THE ACTUAL BOARD OF BAR INQUISITORS AFTER THE INQUISITION LABELED ME MENTALLY ILL FOR TAKING MY CHRISTIAN FAITH TOO SERIOUSLY.  THAT ARGUMENT IS SET FORTH IN MY APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (Petition for Certiorari) FILED ON MARTY GRAS, 2010.  

SO HERE IS THE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE MENTAL HEALTH INQUISITION . . .

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23961843/Brown-v-Bowman-complaint-12-09

(See Exhibit B is you wonder if Brown really is sane enough to be a lawyer.  (Insert joke here))

I have learned a valuable lesson through my processing, denial and effective seven year ban from the practice of law.  (Explanation:  After 10 years of successful lawyering — no disciplinary action taken against me — I have been denied entrance into the Indiana bar and told to not even ask again until 2014 — a full seven years after my initial application.)

The Board of Law Examiners released a 30 page ruling excoriating me for, among other modernist “sins” (more to follow) daring to take issue with Dr. Stephen Ross — a state-assigned psychologist who subjected me to a post modern inquisition using, among other devices of subjectivist intrigue, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Index II. 

I became even more the enemy when I pointed out that Dr. Elizabeth Bowman, the government-assigned psychiatrist,  shows signs of being an anti-Catholic bigot and has certainly authored articles and seminar materials against “the patriarchy” including this one arguing that persons of my faith expression belonged, er, shall we say “not in Heaven“  (see next to last paragraph) and appearing in a documentary where she charges that Catholic priests fabricated exorcism testimony.

WHO WAS IT THAT STEELED ME TO BE SO DARN HARD ON GOVERNMENT BUREACRATS????  (more…)