Today we continue our study at the feet of the modern prophet Solzhenitsyn. Our tutoring under this great mind begins at this post. We are studying his 1978 Harvard speech.
That which follows in green font is Alexander’s most geopolitical section in his Harvard address. Note the ominous tone. Some of it is a bit deep, so the ArchAngel Institute has broken it up in purple.
Shortsightedness
Very well known representatives of your society, such as George Kennan, say: we cannot apply moral criteria to politics. Thus we mix good and evil, right and wrong and make space for the absolute triumph of absolute Evil in the world.
In other words, Alexander teaches that mixing good and evil in a pragmatic fashion, as is the status quo in America these days, will result in the triumph of “absolute Evil.” It would appear that Alexander speaks of a final conflict once again.
On the contrary, only moral criteria can help the West against communism’s well planned world strategy.
The Harvard elite had to hate the above line!
There are no other criteria. Practical or occasional considerations of any kind will inevitably be swept away by strategy. After a certain level of the problem has been reached, legalistic thinking induces paralysis; it prevents one from seeing the size and meaning of events.
America’s secularized academic elites are the blind leading the blind.
In spite of the abundance of information, or maybe because of it, the West has difficulties in understanding reality such as it is. There have been naive predictions by some American experts who believed that Angola would become the Soviet Union’s Vietnam or that Cuban expeditions in Africa would best be stopped by special U.S. courtesy to Cuba. Kennan’s advice to his own country — to begin unilateral disarmament — belongs to the same category. If you only knew how the youngest of the Moscow Old Square [1] officials laugh at your political wizards! As to Fidel Castro, he frankly scorns the United States, sending his troops to distant adventures from his country right next to yours.
Harvard’s elites were among those cheering most loudly for these dangerous policies in the 70’s.
However, the most cruel mistake occurred with the failure to understand the Vietnam war. Some people sincerely wanted all wars to stop just as soon as possible; others believed that there should be room for national, or communist, self-determination in Vietnam, or in Cambodia, as we see today with particular clarity. But members of the U.S. anti-war movement wound up being involved in the betrayal of Far Eastern nations, in a genocide and in the suffering today imposed on 30 million people there. Do those convinced pacifists hear the moans coming from there? Do they understand their responsibility today? Or do they prefer not to hear?
The same would later be asked of those who encouraged and then abandoned Iraqi freedom fighters in 1991, as was done in the Bay of Pigs and as was done to all of Eastern Europe at Yalta. Duplicity in high places seems to be the rule far too often.
The American Intelligentsia lost its [nerve] and as a consequence thereof danger has come much closer to the United States. But there is no awareness of this.
Once again, the Harvard elites must have been cut to the quick. Alexander was fortunate to have gotten away with only his career stoned. No wonder he fell from grace after this speech.
Your shortsighted politicians who signed the hasty Vietnam capitulation seemingly gave America a carefree breathing pause; however, a hundredfold Vietnam now looms over you. That small Vietnam had been a warning and an occasion to mobilize the nation’s courage. But if a full-fledged America suffered a real defeat from a small communist half-country, how can the West hope to stand firm in the future?
We can stand only on the Order of the Most High. We have instead trusted in our military might. That faith did not serve us well in Vietnam. It does not serve us well today.
I have had occasion already to say that in the 20th century democracy has not won any major war without help and protection from a powerful continental ally whose philosophy and ideology it did not question. In World War II against Hitler, instead of winning that war with its own forces, which would certainly have been sufficient, Western democracy grew and cultivated another enemy who would prove worse and more powerful yet, as Hitler never had so many resources and so many people, nor did he offer any attractive ideas, or have such a large number of supporters in the West — a potential fifth column — as the Soviet Union.
Alexander stands before America’s academic elite and chides them for helping to create a monster named Stalin. FDR then fed all of Eastern Europe to that monster, a nightmare visited upon Poland, East Germany, Romania and elsewhere that ended only when Pope John Paul II called the Church to the barricades. The academic elite training America’s best and brightest slept well beside Uncle Joe Stalin while they threw stones at Pope John Paul II. Alexander rightly pointed them out as a large part of America’s problem back in the late 70’s. It is very sad that their poison was allowed to metastasize and spread across America in the decades that followed.
At present, some Western voices already have spoken of obtaining protection from a third power against aggression in the next world conflict, if there is one; in this case the shield would be China. But I would not wish such an outcome to any country in the world. First of all, it is again a doomed alliance with Evil; also, it would grant the United States a respite, but when at a later date China with its billion people would turn around armed with American weapons, America itself would fall prey to a genocide similar to the one perpetrated in Cambodia in our days.
Alexander waxes apocalyptic once again. Our previous post on such “final conflict” thoughts is found here.
It would be fair to say that Solzhenitsyn did not believe the West could have an alliance with China that would end up in anyplace other than a world war — likely the last world war.
As Rudyard Kilping wrote:
Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the two shall meet,
|
|
Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment Seat;
|